Li Dejiao, Taniguchi Elise V, Cai Sophie, Paschalis Eleftherios I, Wang Haobing, Miller John B, Turalba Angela V, Greenstein Scott H, Brauner Stacey, Pasquale Louis R, Shen Lucy Q
Department of Ophthalmology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;101(3):299-304. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308586. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
To compare swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain OCT (EDI-OCT) in quantitative assessment of optic nerve head (ONH) parameters.
In a cross-sectional study, patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and age-matched control subjects underwent SS-OCT and EDI-OCT B-scans of the ONH in a single visit. Two masked readers independently measured the horizontal and vertical lamina cribrosa depth (LCDH and LCDV, respectively), as well as thinnest Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) from SS-OCT and EDI-OCT scans. We assessed agreement between SS-OCT and EDI-OCT measurements by linear regression models, Bland-Altman analysis and concordance correlation coefficients (CCC). Intrareader and inter-reader reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
One eye from each of 40 patients with POAG and 20 controls were included. All three ONH measurements were higher on SS-OCT than on EDI-OCT, with significant differences in LCDH (mean difference=31.7 µm, p<0.01) and thinnest BMO-MRW (mean difference=20.5 µm, p<0.01). Linear regression models described the agreement between SS-OCT and EDI-OCT measurements with R>0.8 for LCDH among both patients with POAG and controls and for thinnest BMO-MRW among patients with POAG. The CCC was >0.8 overall for each parameter. Intrareader and inter-reader ICCs were ≥0.989 and ≥0.964, respectively, for all parameters.
LCDH, LCDV and thinnest BMO-MRW measurements are not interchangeable between SS-OCT and EDI-OCT, but show good intrareader and inter-reader reproducibility and interdevice agreement for quantitative characterisation of the ONH, particularly among patients with glaucoma.
比较扫频光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)和增强深度成像光谱域光学相干断层扫描(EDI-OCT)对视神经乳头(ONH)参数的定量评估。
在一项横断面研究中,原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者和年龄匹配的对照受试者在单次就诊时接受了ONH的SS-OCT和EDI-OCT B扫描。两名盲法阅片者分别从SS-OCT和EDI-OCT扫描中独立测量水平和垂直筛板深度(分别为LCDH和LCDV),以及最薄的布鲁赫膜开口最小边缘宽度(BMO-MRW)。我们通过线性回归模型、Bland-Altman分析和一致性相关系数(CCC)评估SS-OCT和EDI-OCT测量之间的一致性。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估阅片者内和阅片者间的可重复性。
纳入了40例POAG患者和20例对照者的各一只眼。SS-OCT上所有三项ONH测量值均高于EDI-OCT,LCDH(平均差值=31.7 µm,p<0.01)和最薄BMO-MRW(平均差值=20.5 µm,p<0.01)存在显著差异。线性回归模型描述了POAG患者和对照者中LCDH以及POAG患者中最薄BMO-MRW的SS-OCT和EDI-OCT测量之间的一致性,R>0.8。每个参数的总体CCC>0.8。所有参数的阅片者内和阅片者间ICC分别≥0.989和≥0.964。
LCDH、LCDV和最薄BMO-MRW测量在SS-OCT和EDI-OCT之间不可互换,但在ONH的定量特征描述方面显示出良好的阅片者内和阅片者间可重复性以及设备间一致性,尤其是在青光眼患者中。