Suppr超能文献

比较光学相干断层扫描径向和立方扫描模式测量青光眼和正常眼中的 Bruch 膜开口最小边缘宽度(BMO-MRW):横断面和纵向分析。

Comparing optical coherence tomography radial and cube scan patterns for measuring Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) in glaucoma and healthy eyes: cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;102(3):344-351. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-310111. Epub 2017 Aug 3.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the cube and radial scan patterns of the spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) for quantifying the Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW).

METHODS

Sixty healthy eyes and 189 glaucomatous eyes were included. The optic nerve head cube and radial pattern scans were acquired using Spectralis SD-OCT. BMO-MRWs were automatically delineated using the San Diego Automated Layer Segmentation Algorithm. The BMO-MRW diagnostic accuracy for glaucoma detection and rates of change derived from the two scan patterns were compared.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the baseline global BMO-MRW measurements of cube and radial scans for healthy (301.9±57.8 µm and 334.7±61.8 µm, respectively, p<0.003) and glaucoma eyes (181.2±63.0 µm and 210.2±67.2 µm, respectively, p<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for differentiating between healthy and glaucoma eyes was 0.90 for both the radial scan-based and cube scan-based BMO-MRW. No significant difference in the rate of BMO-MRW change (mean follow-up years) by scan pattern was found among both healthy (cube: -1.47 µm/year, radial: -1.53 µm/year; p=0.48) (1.6 years) and glaucoma eyes (cube: -2.37 µm/year, radial: -2.28 µm/year; p=0.45) (2.6 years).

CONCLUSION

Although the cube scan-based BMO-MRW was significantly smaller than the radial scan-based BMO-MRW, we found no significant difference between the two scan patterns for detecting glaucoma, identifying BMO location and measuring the rate of BMO-MRW change. These results suggest that although BMO-MRW estimates are not interchangeable, both scan patterns can be used for monitoring BMO-MRW changes over time.

摘要

目的

比较光谱域光相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)的立方体和放射状扫描模式,以定量测量布鲁赫膜开口最小边缘宽度(BMO-MRW)。

方法

纳入 60 只健康眼和 189 只青光眼眼。使用 Spectralis SD-OCT 采集视神经头立方体和放射状扫描。使用圣地亚哥自动分层分割算法自动描绘 BMO-MRW。比较两种扫描模式对青光眼检测的 BMO-MRW 诊断准确性和变化率。

结果

健康眼(分别为 301.9±57.8 μm 和 334.7±61.8 μm,p<0.003)和青光眼眼(分别为 181.2±63.0 μm 和 210.2±67.2 μm,p<0.001)的基线全局 BMO-MRW 测量值在立方体和放射状扫描之间存在显著差异。基于放射状扫描的和基于立方体扫描的 BMO-MRW 区分健康眼和青光眼眼的受试者工作特征曲线下面积均为 0.90。两种扫描模式的 BMO-MRW 变化率(平均随访年限)之间没有显著差异,健康眼(立方体:-1.47 μm/年,放射状:-1.53 μm/年;p=0.48)(1.6 年)和青光眼眼(立方体:-2.37 μm/年,放射状:-2.28 μm/年;p=0.45)(2.6 年)。

结论

尽管基于立方体扫描的 BMO-MRW 明显小于基于放射状扫描的 BMO-MRW,但我们发现两种扫描模式在检测青光眼、识别 BMO 位置和测量 BMO-MRW 变化率方面没有显著差异。这些结果表明,尽管 BMO-MRW 估计值不可互换,但两种扫描模式都可用于随时间监测 BMO-MRW 变化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验