Smyth Elizabeth C, Fassan Matteo, Cunningham David, Allum William H, Okines Alicia F C, Lampis Andrea, Hahne Jens C, Rugge Massimo, Peckitt Clare, Nankivell Matthew, Langley Ruth, Ghidini Michele, Braconi Chiara, Wotherspoon Andrew, Grabsch Heike I, Valeri Nicola
Elizabeth C. Smyth, David Cunningham, William H. Allum, Alicia F.C. Okines, Clare Peckitt, Chiara Braconi, Andrew Wotherspoon, and Nicola Valeri, Royal Marsden Hospital; Andrea Lampis, Jens C. Hahne, Michele Ghidini, Chiara Braconi, and Nicola Valeri, The Institute of Cancer Research, London and Sutton; Matthew Nankivell and Ruth Langley, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London; Heike I. Grabsch, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Matteo Fassan and Massimo Rugge, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; and Heike I. Grabsch, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 10;34(23):2721-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.7692. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
The Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) trial established perioperative epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy as a standard of care for patients with resectable esophagogastric cancer. However, identification of patients at risk for relapse remains challenging. We evaluated whether pathologic response and lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are prognostic in patients treated in the MAGIC trial.
Pathologic regression was assessed in resection specimens by two independent pathologists using the Mandard tumor regression grading system (TRG). Differences in overall survival (OS) according to TRG were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards method established the relationships among TRG, clinical-pathologic variables, and OS.
Three hundred thirty resection specimens were analyzed. In chemotherapy-treated patients with a TRG of 1 or 2, median OS was not reached, whereas for patients with a TRG of 3, 4, or 5, median OS was 20.47 months. On univariate analysis, high TRG and lymph node metastases were negatively related to survival (Mandard TRG 3, 4, or 5: hazard ratio [HR], 1.94; 95% CI, 1.11 to 3.39; P = .0209; lymph node metastases: HR, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.88 to 7.0; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, only lymph node status was independently predictive of OS (HR, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.70 to 6.63; P < .001).
Lymph node metastases and not pathologic response to chemotherapy was the only independent predictor of survival after chemotherapy plus resection in the MAGIC trial. Prospective evaluation of whether omitting postoperative chemotherapy and/or switching to a noncross-resistant regimen in patients with lymph node-positive disease whose tumor did not respond to preoperative epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil may be appropriate.
医学研究委员会辅助性胃癌灌注化疗(MAGIC)试验确定了围手术期表柔比星、顺铂和氟尿嘧啶化疗作为可切除食管癌和胃癌患者的标准治疗方案。然而,识别有复发风险的患者仍然具有挑战性。我们评估了新辅助化疗后的病理反应和淋巴结状态在MAGIC试验治疗的患者中是否具有预后价值。
由两名独立病理学家使用Mandard肿瘤消退分级系统(TRG)评估切除标本中的病理消退情况。根据TRG评估总生存期(OS)的差异,采用Kaplan-Meier方法并使用对数秩检验进行比较。使用Cox比例风险法进行单因素和多因素分析,确定TRG、临床病理变量和OS之间的关系。
分析了330份切除标本。在接受化疗且TRG为1或2的患者中,未达到中位OS,而TRG为3、4或5的患者中位OS为20.47个月。单因素分析显示,高TRG和淋巴结转移与生存呈负相关(Mandard TRG 3、4或5:风险比[HR],1.94;95%CI,1.11至3.39;P = 0.0209;淋巴结转移:HR,3.63;95%CI,1.88至7.0;P < 0.001)。多因素分析显示,只有淋巴结状态是OS的独立预测因素(HR,3.36;95%CI,1.70至6.63;P < 0.001)。
在MAGIC试验中,淋巴结转移而非化疗的病理反应是化疗加切除术后生存的唯一独立预测因素。对于肿瘤对术前表柔比星、顺铂和氟尿嘧啶无反应的淋巴结阳性疾病患者,省略术后化疗和/或改用非交叉耐药方案是否合适,需要进行前瞻性评估。