Krinzinger Helga
1 LFG Klinische Neuropsychologie des Kindes- und Jugendalters, Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie des Kindes- und Jugendalters, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, Aachen.
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2016 Sep;44(5):338-350. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000446. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
Studies in children with AD(H)D without mathematical learning disability (MLD) as well as studies on the effects of methylphenidate on arithmetic have shown that most deficits in mathematics and most error types commonly described as specific to developmental dyscalculia (e. g., finger-counting, fact-retrieval deficit, complex counting, difficulties with carry/borrow procedures, self-corrections) cannot be classified as such and should thus not be used for the differential diagnosis of primary dyscalculia and secondary MLD. This article proposes using the overall score in the dyscalculia test Basis-Math 4-8 (Moser Opitz et al., 2010) as well as implausible subtraction errors as a marker for dyscalculia and the number of self-corrections made during the test as a cognitive marker for attention deficits. Hierarchical cluster analyses were calculated in a sample of 51 clinically referred children with normal IQ and suspicion of MLD, using IQ, years of schooling, overall score of the Basis-Math 4–8 and number of self-corrections in this test as variables. The results revealed a subgroup with primary dyscalculia as well as three subgroups with secondary MLD (two with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, one with depression and one small subgroup with high IQ). In conclusion, the Basis-Math 4–8 (Moser Opitz et al., 2010) can offer substantial information for the differential diagnosis of dyscalculia and secondary deficits in mathematics due to attention problems and enable optimization of treatment decisions for the different groups.
对没有数学学习障碍(MLD)的注意缺陷多动障碍(AD[H]D)儿童的研究,以及对哌甲酯对算术影响的研究表明,大多数数学方面的缺陷以及大多数通常被描述为发育性计算障碍所特有的错误类型(例如,手指计数、事实检索缺陷、复杂计数、进位/借位程序困难、自我纠正)不能被归类为发育性计算障碍,因此不应用于原发性计算障碍和继发性MLD的鉴别诊断。本文建议使用计算障碍测试Basis-Math 4-8(Moser Opitz等人,2010年)的总分以及不合理的减法错误作为计算障碍的标志物,并将测试期间进行的自我纠正次数作为注意力缺陷的认知标志物。在一个由51名临床转诊的智商正常且疑似MLD的儿童组成的样本中,以智商、受教育年限、Basis-Math 4-8的总分以及该测试中的自我纠正次数为变量进行了层次聚类分析。结果显示出一个原发性计算障碍亚组以及三个继发性MLD亚组(两个患有注意力缺陷多动障碍,一个患有抑郁症,还有一个小的高智商亚组)。总之,Basis-Math 4-8(Moser Opitz等人,2010年)可为计算障碍以及因注意力问题导致的继发性数学缺陷的鉴别诊断提供大量信息,并有助于优化针对不同群体的治疗决策。