Pentz Mary Ann, Riggs Nathaniel R, Warren Christopher M
The Institute for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention Research (IPR), Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA.
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1570, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jun 1;163 Suppl 1:S54-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.03.001.
Executive function (EF) includes emotional regulation, planning and decision-making, and behavioral impulse control. Improving youth substance use (SU) prevention by targeting EF poses challenges including determining whether specific sub-domains of EF are more associated with SU than others, whether EF is related to some types of SU more than others, and whether EF programs might be enhanced by inclusion of mindfulness training.
Data were drawn from two studies from the Pathways to Health project: a randomized controlled trial of 4th-6th graders and a cross-sectional pilot study of the relationship of EF to specific types of SU in a sample of 7th graders. Survey measures included assessment of the EF subdomains of inhibitory control (IC), emotional control, working memory, organization/planning, lifetime SU (tobacco and alcohol use), and mindfulness. Analyses included multivariate and multiple group path analysis.
Results suggested that the EF sub-domain of IC was the strongest and most consistent predictor of SU, particularly cigarette and e-cigarette use, though emotional control was predictive of alcohol use among late-elementary school students. In the 7th grade sample, IC was predictive of alcohol, cigarette, and e-cigarette use only among students in the low 75% of mindfulness.
Findings from the present studies suggest that improvements in SU prevention efforts may result from increased curricular emphasis on IC and its application to multiple substance use prevention, and systematically integrating mindfulness with EF skills training. Future research should examine whether EF-SU relationships vary across patterns of SU and types of measures used to assess EF.
执行功能(EF)包括情绪调节、计划与决策以及行为冲动控制。通过针对执行功能来改善青少年物质使用(SU)预防工作面临诸多挑战,包括确定执行功能的特定子领域是否比其他领域与物质使用的关联更强,执行功能与某些类型的物质使用的关联是否比其他类型更强,以及执行功能项目是否可以通过纳入正念训练得到加强。
数据来自健康之路项目的两项研究:一项针对四至六年级学生的随机对照试验,以及一项针对七年级学生样本中执行功能与特定类型物质使用关系的横断面试点研究。调查措施包括对抑制控制(IC)、情绪控制、工作记忆、组织/计划等执行功能子领域、终生物质使用(烟草和酒精使用)以及正念的评估。分析包括多变量和多组路径分析。
结果表明,抑制控制这一执行功能子领域是物质使用最强且最一致的预测因素,尤其是香烟和电子烟使用,不过情绪控制可预测小学高年级学生的酒精使用。在七年级样本中,仅在正念处于低75%水平的学生中,抑制控制可预测酒精、香烟和电子烟使用。
本研究结果表明,加强课程对抑制控制及其在多种物质使用预防中的应用的重视,并将正念与执行功能技能训练系统地整合,可能会改善物质使用预防工作。未来的研究应探讨执行功能与物质使用的关系是否因物质使用模式和用于评估执行功能的测量类型而异。