Rampling Tommy, Ewer Katie J, Bowyer Georgina, Bliss Carly M, Edwards Nick J, Wright Danny, Payne Ruth O, Venkatraman Navin, de Barra Eoghan, Snudden Claudia M, Poulton Ian D, de Graaf Hans, Sukhtankar Priya, Roberts Rachel, Ivinson Karen, Weltzin Rich, Rajkumar Bebi-Yassin, Wille-Reece Ulrike, Lee Cynthia K, Ockenhouse Christian F, Sinden Robert E, Gerry Stephen, Lawrie Alison M, Vekemans Johan, Morelle Danielle, Lievens Marc, Ballou Ripley W, Cooke Graham S, Faust Saul N, Gilbert Sarah, Hill Adrian V S
The Jenner Institute.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin.
J Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 1;214(5):772-81. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw244. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
BACKGROUND: The need for a highly efficacious vaccine against Plasmodium falciparum remains pressing. In this controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) study, we assessed the safety, efficacy and immunogenicity of a schedule combining 2 distinct vaccine types in a staggered immunization regimen: one inducing high-titer antibodies to circumsporozoite protein (RTS,S/AS01B) and the other inducing potent T-cell responses to thrombospondin-related adhesion protein (TRAP) by using a viral vector. METHOD: Thirty-seven healthy malaria-naive adults were vaccinated with either a chimpanzee adenovirus 63 and modified vaccinia virus Ankara-vectored vaccine expressing a multiepitope string fused to TRAP and 3 doses of RTS,S/AS01B (group 1; n = 20) or 3 doses of RTS,S/AS01B alone (group 2; n = 17). CHMI was delivered by mosquito bites to 33 vaccinated subjects at week 12 after the first vaccination and to 6 unvaccinated controls. RESULTS: No suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions or severe adverse events related to vaccination were reported. Protective vaccine efficacy was observed in 14 of 17 subjects (82.4%) in group 1 and 12 of 16 subjects (75%) in group 2. All control subjects received a diagnosis of blood-stage malaria parasite infection. Both vaccination regimens were immunogenic. Fourteen protected subjects underwent repeat CHMI 6 months after initial CHMI; 7 of 8 (87.5%) in group 1 and 5 of 6 (83.3%) in group 2 remained protected. CONCLUSIONS: The high level of sterile efficacy observed in this trial is encouraging for further evaluation of combination approaches using these vaccine types. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01883609.
Vaccines (Basel). 2025-4-14
Pathog Dis. 2024-2-7
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2024-12
BioDrugs. 2023-11
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023-2-22
Front Immunol. 2023
Infect Immun. 2015-12-14
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015-12