Rosner D, Lane W W, Nemoto T
Department of Breast Surgery, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263.
Cancer. 1989 Jul 1;64(1):6-15. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890701)64:1<6::aid-cncr2820640103>3.0.co;2-l.
The predictive value of estrogen receptor (ER) level for response to chemotherapy was studied in 182 patients with metastatic breast cancer in a prospective study. Patients were stratified according to ER status and dominant site of disease and randomized to one of three regimens: cyclophosphamide, 5-Fluorouracil, and prednisone (CFP) versus CFP, methotrexate, and vincristine (CFPMV) versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). There was no significant differences in all response categories (P = 0.21), was taken as a predictor for response to chemotherapy, there was no significant difference in overall response (P = 0.61) between ER+ (62/108, 57%) and ER- patients (31/49, 63%). However, there was a significant trend toward a higher degree of response in ER- patients (more complete response [CR] nine of 49, 18%, and fewer failures six of 49, 12%) than in ER+ (less CR seven of 108, 7%, and more failures 37/108, 34%) (P = 0.006). Patients with higher measured levels of ER showed worse response (Kendall's tau C, P = 0.026). This trend for ER- patients to have better response than ER+ patients was generally consistent, regardless of the predominant site of metastases or chemotherapy regimen (P = 0.04 for CFP; P = 0.08 for CFPMV; and P = 0.20 for AC). The advantage of a better response for ER- patients was nullified by an earlier relapse which was reflected in longer duration of remission, time to treatment failure, and survival in favor of ER+ patients (12.3 months versus 7.3 months remission duration, 18.7 months versus 13.6 months survival in partial responders). These data suggest that ER- patients respond to a higher extent to chemotherapy but relapse sooner than ER+ patients, suggesting a more rapid growth for ER- tumors. In patients with ER- tumors and poorer prognosis on conventional chemotherapy, new trials of intensive consolidation after response should be considered.
在一项前瞻性研究中,对182例转移性乳腺癌患者的雌激素受体(ER)水平对化疗反应的预测价值进行了研究。患者根据ER状态和疾病的主要部位进行分层,并随机分为三种治疗方案之一:环磷酰胺、5-氟尿嘧啶和泼尼松(CFP),对比CFP、甲氨蝶呤和长春新碱(CFPMV),对比多柔比星和环磷酰胺(AC)。所有反应类别均无显著差异(P = 0.21),将其作为化疗反应的预测指标,ER阳性(62/108,57%)和ER阴性患者(31/49,63%)之间的总体反应无显著差异(P = 0.61)。然而,与ER阳性患者(108例中有7例完全缓解[CR],7%,49例中有37例失败,34%)相比,ER阴性患者(49例中有9例完全缓解,18%,49例中有6例失败,12%)有更高程度反应的显著趋势(P = 0.006)。ER测量水平较高的患者反应较差(肯德尔tau C,P = 0.026)。无论转移的主要部位或化疗方案如何,ER阴性患者比ER阳性患者有更好反应的这一趋势总体上是一致的(CFP组P = 0.04;CFPMV组P = 0.08;AC组P = 0.20)。ER阴性患者更好反应的优势被早期复发抵消,这体现在缓解期、治疗失败时间和生存率方面有利于ER阳性患者(部分缓解者的缓解期为12.3个月对7.3个月,生存期为18.7个月对13.6个月)。这些数据表明,ER阴性患者对化疗的反应程度更高,但比ER阳性患者复发更早,这表明ER阴性肿瘤生长更快。对于ER阴性肿瘤且常规化疗预后较差的患者,应考虑在反应后进行强化巩固的新试验。