Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
Endoscopy. 2016 Sep;48(9):809-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108726. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
Diverse endoscopic methods, such as placement of temporary self-expandable stents, have proven effective for the treatment of post-bariatric surgery leaks. However, some patients do not respond to the usual endoscopic treatment. This study tested the efficacy of an alternative treatment strategy based on trans-fistulary drainage with double-pigtail plastic stents.
We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with abdominal collections following bariatric surgery who were treated by trans-fistulary stenting between May 2007 and February 2015. Clinical success was defined as a sustained (> 4 months) clinical resolution (patient discharged from the hospital without antibiotics and able to resume a normal diet) and radiological response. Patient records, radiological images, and the hospital endoscopy database were reviewed.
A total of 33 patients (26 women/7 men, mean age 42 years [SD 11.2]) were included. Collections occurred after sleeve gastrectomy (n = 28) or after gastric bypass (n = 5). Fourteen patients were treated by trans-fistulary stenting as primary treatment, and 19 patients had undergone previous unsuccessful endoscopic treatment. No serious complication occurred during the drainage procedure. Clinical success was achieved in 26 patients (78.8 %). In two successfully treated patients, stents are still in place. Spontaneous stent migration occurred in 12 patients. In 12 patients, the stents were removed, either electively (n = 5) or because of complications (ulcerations n = 3, upper gastrointestinal symptoms n = 3, splenic hematoma n = 1).
Trans-fistulary drainage of post-bariatric abdominal collections is safe and associated with high success rates. This technique can be considered in previously untreated patients, when a collection is not properly drained percutaneously, or after failure of other endoscopic treatments.
多种内镜方法,如临时自膨式支架的放置,已被证明对治疗减重手术后漏的有效。然而,一些患者对常规内镜治疗没有反应。本研究测试了基于经皮瘘管引流和双猪尾塑料支架的替代治疗策略的疗效。
我们对 2007 年 5 月至 2015 年 2 月期间接受经皮瘘管支架置入治疗的减重手术后腹部脓肿患者进行了回顾性分析。临床成功定义为持续(>4 个月)临床缓解(患者出院时无需使用抗生素且能够恢复正常饮食)和影像学反应。回顾患者记录、影像学图像和医院内镜数据库。
共纳入 33 例患者(26 例女性/7 例男性,平均年龄 42 岁[SD 11.2])。收集发生在袖状胃切除术(n=28)或胃旁路手术后(n=5)。14 例患者经经皮瘘管支架置入作为初始治疗,19 例患者先前接受过不成功的内镜治疗。引流过程中未发生严重并发症。26 例患者(78.8%)获得临床成功。在 2 例成功治疗的患者中,支架仍在位。12 例患者发生支架自发性迁移。12 例患者因并发症(溃疡 n=5、上消化道症状 n=3、脾血肿 n=1)或自愿(n=5)取出支架。
经皮瘘管引流减重手术后腹部脓肿是安全的,成功率高。当经皮引流不充分时,或者在其他内镜治疗失败后,该技术可考虑用于未治疗的患者。