• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德国联邦残疾人平等待遇法评估]

[The Evaluation of the German Federal Law of Equal Treatment of Disabled Persons].

作者信息

Ramm D, Welti F

机构信息

Institut für Sozialwesen, Universität Kassel, Kassel.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2017 Aug;79(8-09):e56-e61. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108577. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1055/s-0042-108577
PMID:27315232
Abstract

The German federal law of equal treatment of disabled persons (Behindertengleichstellungsgesetz des Bundes, BGG) came into effect in 2002. An evaluation of this law was required by the national plan of action for the implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Project evaluation objectives were to estimate whether the needs of disabled persons were being met and whether the instruments proved to be adequate for fulfilling the aims of the law. Jurisprudential analyses in combination with surveys were used for this research. It was found that the BGG still lacks adequate publicity. Its impact, however, was assessed as positive. Results also indicate that there might be some shortcomings with regard to accessibility. For a closer examination, however, more data focusing on accessibility in the context of health care and rehabilitation is.

摘要

德国《残疾人平等待遇联邦法》(Bundes Behindertengleichstellungsgesetz,BGG)于2002年生效。《联合国残疾人权利公约》(CRPD)国家行动计划要求对该法律进行评估。项目评估目标是估计残疾人的需求是否得到满足,以及这些手段是否被证明足以实现该法律的目标。本研究采用法学分析与调查相结合的方法。研究发现,BGG仍然缺乏足够的宣传。然而,其影响被评估为积极的。结果还表明,在无障碍环境方面可能存在一些不足。然而,为了进行更深入的研究,需要更多关注医疗保健和康复背景下无障碍环境的数据。

相似文献

1
[The Evaluation of the German Federal Law of Equal Treatment of Disabled Persons].[德国联邦残疾人平等待遇法评估]
Gesundheitswesen. 2017 Aug;79(8-09):e56-e61. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108577. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
2
[Six keys to the "handicapped" law].《“残疾人”法律的六大关键》
Soins Gerontol. 2005 Mar-Apr(52):9.
3
[The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities--gaining a foothold in psychiatry's political seesaw?].[《联合国残疾人权利公约》——在精神病学的政治跷跷板上站稳脚跟?]
Psychiatr Prax. 2011 Jul;38(5):215-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1266111. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
4
Teaching health law. A service learning project: disability, access, and health care.健康法教学。一个服务学习项目:残疾、就医机会与医疗保健。
J Law Med Ethics. 2010 Spring;38(1):154-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00476.x.
5
[New deal for handicapped persons].[为残疾人制定的新政策]
Soins. 2005 Mar(693):10.
6
Civil rights extended to disabled.民权扩展至残疾人。
Physician Exec. 1991 Jul-Aug;17(4):49-52.
7
Radiologists and disability access requirements.放射科医生与残疾人通道要求。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Dec;10(12):892-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.08.015.
8
["Target groups 1-3" must be granted priority access to health care services. Health care needs of somatically and mentally disabled persons in Robetsfors].“目标群体1至3”必须被给予获得医疗保健服务的优先机会。罗伯茨福什躯体和精神残疾人的医疗保健需求。
Lakartidningen. 2001 Sep 19;98(38):4054-8.
9
[BAR position paper on the future development of medical, vocational and social rehabilitation in the 14th Legislative Session. Federal Rehabilitation Council].
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1999 Feb;38(1):38-43.
10
Justice and equality in mental health law: the European experience.精神卫生法中的正义与平等:欧洲经验
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007 Jan-Feb;30(1):18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.08.004. Epub 2006 Dec 8.