Suppr超能文献

高危前列腺癌患者治疗的差异:基于人群队列的结果

Disparities in Treatment of Patients With High-risk Prostate Cancer: Results From a Population-based Cohort.

作者信息

Wang Elyn H, Yu James B, Abouassally Robert, Meropol Neal J, Cooper Gregory, Shah Nilay D, Williams Stephen B, Gonzalez Christopher, Smaldone Marc C, Kutikov Alexander, Zhu Hui, Kim Simon P

机构信息

School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Yale University, New Haven, CT; Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

出版信息

Urology. 2016 Sep;95:88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the variation in primary treatment of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) by different hospital characteristics in the United States.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify patients diagnosed with pretreatment high-risk PCa from 2004 to 2011. The primary outcomes were different forms of primary therapy or watchful waiting (WW) across different types of hospitals (community, comprehensive cancer community, and academic hospitals). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to test for differences in treatment by hospital type.

RESULTS

During the study period, we identified 102,701 men diagnosed with high-risk PCa. Overall, the most common treatment was radical prostatectomy (37.0%) followed by radiation therapy (33.2%) and WW (8.5%). Compared with white men with high-risk PCa, black men had lower adjusted odds ratios (OR) for surgery at comprehensive community (OR: 0.64; P <.001) and academic (OR: 0.62; P <.001) hospitals. Similarly, black men were also more likely to be managed with WW at community (OR: 1.49; P <.001), comprehensive cancer community (OR: 1.24; P <.001), and academic (OR: 1.55; P <.001) hospitals, as well as with radiation therapy at comprehensive cancer community (OR: 1.27; P <.001) and academic hospitals (OR: 1.23; P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Disparities in the use of WW and different primary treatments among patients with high-risk PCa persisted across different types of hospitals and over time. Our findings highlight a significant racial disparity in the use of curative therapy for high-risk PCa that should be urgently addressed to ensure that all men with PCa receive appropriate care across all racial groups and cancer care facilities.

摘要

目的

评估美国不同医院特征对高危前列腺癌(PCa)初始治疗的差异。

材料与方法

我们利用国家癌症数据库识别出2004年至2011年期间诊断为治疗前高危PCa的患者。主要结局是不同类型医院(社区医院、综合癌症社区医院和学术医院)的不同初始治疗形式或观察等待(WW)。采用多变量逻辑回归分析来检验不同医院类型在治疗上的差异。

结果

在研究期间,我们识别出102,701名诊断为高危PCa的男性。总体而言,最常见的治疗方法是根治性前列腺切除术(37.0%),其次是放射治疗(33.2%)和观察等待(8.5%)。与高危PCa的白人男性相比,黑人男性在综合社区医院(比值比[OR]:0.64;P<0.001)和学术医院(OR:0.62;P<0.001)接受手术的调整后OR较低。同样,黑人男性在社区医院(OR:1.49;P<0.001)、综合癌症社区医院(OR:1.24;P<0.001)和学术医院(OR:1.55;P<0.001)接受观察等待治疗的可能性也更高,在综合癌症社区医院(OR:1.27;P<0.001)和学术医院(OR:1.23;P<0.001)接受放射治疗的可能性也更高。

结论

高危PCa患者在观察等待和不同初始治疗的使用上存在差异,这种差异在不同类型医院中持续存在且随时间推移而存在。我们的研究结果凸显了高危PCa治愈性治疗使用方面的显著种族差异,应紧急加以解决,以确保所有PCa男性患者在所有种族群体和癌症治疗机构中都能获得适当的治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验