• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

供体年龄与术前终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分的乘积——D-MELD,可预测活体肝移植后的手术结局,尤其是在丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)阳性及接受较小移植物的受者中。

D-MELD, the Product of Donor Age and Preoperative MELD, Predicts Surgical Outcomes After Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Especially in the Recipients With HCV-positive and Smaller Grafts.

作者信息

Tanemura A, Mizuno S, Kato H, Murata Y, Kuriyama N, Azumi Y, Kishiwada M, Usui M, Sakurai H, Isaji S

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, Japan.

Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, Japan.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2016 May;48(4):1025-31. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.090.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.090
PMID:27320548
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Appropriate donor-recipient match has not been explored well in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) unlike deceased-donor liver transplantation. In this study, we evaluate the donor-recipient match using D-MELD (donor age × recipient Modified for End-stage Liver Disease [MELD] score) as a predictor of surgical outcomes in LDLT, paying attention to graft size and hepatitis C virus (HCV) status.

PATIENT AND METHODS

The 120 consecutive recipients who received adult-to-adult LDLT from March 2002 to December 2014 were divided into the two groups according to D-MELD score: D-MELD <1000 (low-D-MELD: n = 101) and D-MELD ≥1000 (high-D-MELD: n = 19).

RESULTS

The 90-day mortality rate was significantly higher in the high-DM group than in low-DM group: 36.8% versus 14.9% (P = .046). In the HCV-positive recipients, the 90-day mortality rate was significantly higher in high-DM group (n = 6) than in low-DM group (n = 37): 66.7% versus 13.5% (P = .012), and the 3-year survival rate was significantly lower in high-DM group than in the low-DM group: 33.3% versus 56.8% (P = .01). In the recipients with left graft, the 90-day mortality rate was significantly higher in the high-DM group (n = 8) than in the low-DM group (n = 41): 50% versus 14.6% (P = .044), and total bilirubin level on postoperative day 14 was significantly higher in the high-DM group than in the low-DM group: 17.4 mg/dL versus 9.2 mg/dL (P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

It was clarified that D-MELD could predict early and long-term surgical outcomes in the recipients who were HCV-positive and who had smaller grafts.

摘要

背景

与尸体供肝肝移植不同,活体供肝肝移植(LDLT)中合适的供受体匹配情况尚未得到充分研究。在本研究中,我们使用供体年龄×受体终末期肝病模型(MELD)改良评分(D-MELD)评估供受体匹配情况,将其作为LDLT手术预后的预测指标,并关注移植物大小和丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)状态。

患者与方法

2002年3月至2014年12月期间连续接受成人对成人LDLT的120例受者,根据D-MELD评分分为两组:D-MELD<1000(低D-MELD组:n = 101)和D-MELD≥1000(高D-MELD组:n = 19)。

结果

高D-MELD组90天死亡率显著高于低D-MELD组:36.8%对14.9%(P = 0.046)。在HCV阳性受者中,高D-MELD组(n = 6)的90天死亡率显著高于低D-MELD组(n = 37):66.7%对13.5%(P = 0.012),高D-MELD组的3年生存率显著低于低D-MELD组:33.3%对56.8%(P = 0.01)。在接受左叶移植物的受者中,高D-MELD组(n = 8)的90天死亡率显著高于低D-MELD组(n = 41):50%对14.6%(P = 0.044),高D-MELD组术后第14天总胆红素水平显著高于低D-MELD组:17.4mg/dL对9.2mg/dL(P = 0.018)。

结论

明确了D-MELD可预测HCV阳性且移植物较小的受者的早期和长期手术预后。

相似文献

1
D-MELD, the Product of Donor Age and Preoperative MELD, Predicts Surgical Outcomes After Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Especially in the Recipients With HCV-positive and Smaller Grafts.供体年龄与术前终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分的乘积——D-MELD,可预测活体肝移植后的手术结局,尤其是在丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)阳性及接受较小移植物的受者中。
Transplant Proc. 2016 May;48(4):1025-31. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.090.
2
(D+10) MELD as a novel predictor of patient and graft survival after adult to adult living donor liver transplantation.(D+10)MELD作为成人至成人活体肝移植后患者和移植物存活的新型预测指标。
Clin Transplant. 2017 May;31(5). doi: 10.1111/ctr.12939. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
3
D-MELD as a predictor of early graft mortality in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation.D-MELD 作为成人对成人活体肝移植中早期移植物死亡率的预测因子。
Transplantation. 2014 Feb 27;97(4):457-62. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000435696.23525.d0.
4
Left lobe living donor liver transplantation in adults: What is the safety limit?成人左叶活体供肝肝移植:安全限度是多少?
Liver Transpl. 2016 Dec;22(12):1666-1675. doi: 10.1002/lt.24611.
5
Comparable Short- and Long-term Outcomes in Living Donor and Deceased Donor Liver Transplantations for Patients With Model for End-stage Liver Disease Scores ≥35 in a Hepatitis-B Endemic Area.在乙肝流行地区,对终末期肝病模型评分≥35的患者进行活体供肝与尸体供肝肝移植的短期和长期疗效比较
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):173-177. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001671.
6
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score does not predict patient or graft survival in living donor liver transplant recipients.终末期肝病模型评分不能预测活体肝移植受者的患者或移植物存活率。
Liver Transpl. 2003 Jul;9(7):737-40. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50122.
7
A graft to body weight ratio less than 0.8 does not exclude adult-to-adult right-lobe living donor liver transplantation.肝移植供体与受体重比小于 0.8 不能排除成人-成人右半活体肝移植。
Liver Transpl. 2009 Dec;15(12):1776-82. doi: 10.1002/lt.21955.
8
High MELD score does not adversely affect outcome of living donor liver transplantation: Experience in 1000 recipients.高终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分对活体肝移植受者的预后并无不利影响:1000例受者的经验
Clin Transplant. 2017 Aug;31(8). doi: 10.1111/ctr.13006.
9
Optimizing repeat liver transplant graft utility through strategic matching of donor and recipient characteristics.通过供体和受体特征的策略性匹配优化再次肝移植移植物的效用。
Liver Transpl. 2015 Nov;21(11):1365-73. doi: 10.1002/lt.24138.
10
Living Donation Versus Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation for Low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Recipients.活体捐赠与循环死亡后肝脏移植在低终末期肝病模型受体中的比较。
Liver Transpl. 2019 Apr;25(4):580-587. doi: 10.1002/lt.25073. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of early recipient mortality after living donor liver transplantation in a tertiary care center in Egypt.埃及一家三级医疗中心活体肝移植术后早期受者死亡的预测因素
Ann Saudi Med. 2019 Sep-Oct;39(5):337-344. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.337. Epub 2019 Oct 3.