• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降低机器人根治性前列腺切除术的成本:三器械技术

Reducing Costs for Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Three-instrument Technique.

作者信息

Ramirez Daniel, Ganesan Vishnu, Nelson Ryan J, Haber Georges-Pascal

机构信息

Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Urology. 2016 Sep;95:213-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.03.067. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2016.03.067
PMID:27320683
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe our technique for performing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and pelvic lymph node dissection using only 3 robotic instruments to reduce disposable costs associated with the robotic surgical platform.

METHODS

The financial impact of robotic surgery is real. Whereas the initial capital investment of the robotic platform (including the cost of the device itself and the maintenance contract) is largely fixed, the cost of disposable instrumentation can vary depending on utilization. Herein we describe our technique for 3-instrument robotic radical prostatectomy that may decrease costs by limiting the use of disposable instruments.

RESULTS

Exclusion of the high-cost energy instruments may reduce operative costs by up to 40%. In addition, using 1 robotic needle driver vs 2 may decrease overall costs by another 12%. At our institution, we have adopted these techniques in cost-efficiency and have gone further by only using 3 instruments during robotic radical prostatectomy. The only 3 instruments necessary to perform a successful RALP are a robotic needle driver, Prograsp forceps, and monopolar scissors.

CONCLUSION

To improve the value of care while utilizing robotic technology, we must be cognizant of keeping operative costs to a minimum while maintaining positive patient outcomes. We demonstrate here a method to decrease disposable operating room costs while preserving the ability to successfully perform a RALP.

摘要

目的

描述我们仅使用3种机器人器械进行机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)和盆腔淋巴结清扫术的技术,以降低与机器人手术平台相关的一次性成本。

方法

机器人手术的经济影响是真实存在的。虽然机器人平台的初始资本投资(包括设备本身的成本和维护合同)在很大程度上是固定的,但一次性器械的成本会因使用情况而有所不同。在此,我们描述我们的3器械机器人根治性前列腺切除术技术,该技术可通过限制一次性器械的使用来降低成本。

结果

排除高成本的能量器械可使手术成本降低多达40%。此外,使用1把机器人持针器而非2把可使总成本再降低12%。在我们机构,我们已在成本效益方面采用了这些技术,并在机器人根治性前列腺切除术期间仅使用3种器械,进一步降低了成本。成功进行RALP所需的仅有的3种器械是机器人持针器、Prograsp钳和单极剪刀。

结论

为了在利用机器人技术的同时提高医疗价值,我们必须在保持患者良好预后的同时,意识到将手术成本降至最低。我们在此展示了一种在保留成功进行RALP能力的同时降低手术室一次性成本的方法。

相似文献

1
Reducing Costs for Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Three-instrument Technique.降低机器人根治性前列腺切除术的成本:三器械技术
Urology. 2016 Sep;95:213-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.03.067. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
2
Reducing robotic prostatectomy costs by minimizing instrumentation.通过减少器械使用来降低机器人前列腺切除术的成本。
J Endourol. 2015 May;29(5):556-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0533. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
3
A Multidimensional Analysis of Prostate Surgery Costs in the United States: Robotic-Assisted versus Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy.美国前列腺手术成本的多维分析:机器人辅助与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术对比
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):391-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.019. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
4
Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放性根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌的成本比较。
Eur Urol. 2010 Mar;57(3):453-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.008. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
5
da Vinci and Open Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Analysis of Insurance Costs.达芬奇机器人与开放性根治性前列腺切除术:临床结果比较及保险费用分析
Urol Int. 2016;96(3):287-94. doi: 10.1159/000431104. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
6
Cost analysis of new robotic competitors: a comparison of direct costs for initial hospital stay between Da Vinci and Hugo RAS for radical prostatectomy.新型机器人竞争者的成本分析:达芬奇与 Hugo RAS 根治性前列腺切除术初始住院费用的直接成本比较。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 13;18(1):251. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01930-w.
7
A cost-utility analysis of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer in Thailand.泰国局限性前列腺癌男性患者行腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的成本效用分析
J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jan;98 Suppl 1:S14-20.
8
Robotic perineal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection using a purpose-built single-port robotic platform.使用专门构建的单孔机器人平台进行机器人会阴根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术。
BJU Int. 2016 Nov;118(5):829-833. doi: 10.1111/bju.13581. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
9
Utilization and impact of surgical technique on the performance of pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.手术技术在根治性前列腺切除术中对盆腔淋巴结清扫操作的应用及影响:来自共享平等准入区域癌症医院数据库的结果
Int J Urol. 2016 Mar;23(3):241-6. doi: 10.1111/iju.13027. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
10
Adapting the robotic platform to small operating theaters: our experience with the side-docking technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.使机器人平台适用于小型手术室:我们采用侧对接技术进行机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的经验。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4464-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4777-1. Epub 2016 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-utility analysis on robot-assisted and laparoscopic prostatectomy based on long-term functional outcomes.基于长期功能结局的机器人辅助前列腺切除术和腹腔镜前列腺切除术的成本效用分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 10;12(1):7658. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10746-3.
2
Artificial intelligence and robotics: a combination that is changing the operating room.人工智能与机器人技术:正在改变手术室的组合。
World J Urol. 2020 Oct;38(10):2359-2366. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03037-6. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
3
Development of a Patient-Based Model for Estimating Operative Times for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
基于患者的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术手术时间估算模型的建立。
J Endourol. 2018 Aug;32(8):730-736. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0249.