The Boden Institute of Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise & Eating Disorders, Level 2 Charles Perkins Centre D17, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
The George Institute for Global Health, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK; The George Institute for Global Health, PO Box M201, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Jun;116:149-58. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.04.037. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
To estimate and compare the results from all randomised trials of triple combinations of anti-diabetes therapies that reported the reduction of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and associated effects on body weight and hypoglycaemia.
PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for trials with at least one study arm on triple therapy and which reported the differences in mean change in HbA1c between two study arms. These were included in a network meta-analysis.
Altogether, 15,182 participants from 40 trials with treatment duration of 6-12months were included. Compared with none/placebo added to dual therapy, the addition of a drug therapy from six of eight drug classes to existing dual therapy resulted in significant additional mean reductions in HbA1c from -0.56% (-6.2mmol/mol; dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors) to -0.94% (-10.3mmol/mol; thiazolidinediones). Of the six drug classes, three were associated with less favourable weight change and two were associated with more favourable weight change when compared with none/placebo added to dual therapy. Furthermore, five drug classes were associated with greater odds of hypoglycaemia. Similar results were observed in analyses of studies with a 6month treatment duration and after excluding study arms that contained insulin.
Overall triple therapy combinations were similar in improving diabetes control although there were some differences in adverse effects. By balancing the risks and benefits of each therapy, the estimates of pairwise comparisons of triple therapies for HbA1c, body weight and hypoglycaemia provided in this study may further inform evidence based practice.
评估和比较报告糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)降低及对体重和低血糖影响的抗糖尿病三联疗法所有随机试验的结果,比较这些结果。
检索 PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆,纳入至少有一项三联疗法研究臂且报告了两组间 HbA1c 平均变化差异的试验,并对这些试验进行网络荟萃分析。
共纳入来自 40 项试验的 15182 名治疗持续时间为 6-12 个月的参与者。与无/安慰剂添加到双联疗法相比,将八种药物类别中的六种药物疗法添加到现有双联疗法中,HbA1c 平均进一步降低了 0.56%(-6.2mmol/mol;二肽基肽酶 4 抑制剂)至-0.94%(-10.3mmol/mol;噻唑烷二酮类)。在这六种药物类别中,有三种与体重变化不利相关,两种与体重变化有利相关,与无/安慰剂添加到双联疗法相比。此外,有五种药物类别与低血糖的可能性增加相关。在分析治疗持续时间为 6 个月的研究和排除包含胰岛素的研究臂后,也观察到了类似的结果。
总体而言,三联疗法在改善糖尿病控制方面相似,但在不良反应方面存在一些差异。通过平衡每种治疗方法的风险和益处,本研究中对 HbA1c、体重和低血糖的三联治疗的两两比较估计值可能会进一步为循证实践提供信息。