• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管手术后的再入院事件:原因与成本

The Readmission Event after Vascular Surgery: Causes and Costs.

作者信息

Duwayri Yazan, Goss Jonathan, Knechtle William, Veeraswamy Ravi K, Arya Shipra, Rajani Ravi R, Brewster Luke P, Dodson Thomas F, Sweeney John F

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;36:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.02.024. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2016.02.024
PMID:27321981
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study evaluates the readmission diagnoses after vascular surgical interventions and the associated hospital costs.

METHODS

Patients readmitted after undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS), carotid endarterectomy (CEA), infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OAAA), suprainguinal revascularization (SUPRA), or infrainguinal revascularization (INFRA) between January 1, 2008 and October 20, 2013 at a single academic institution were retrospectively identified. Demographic, preoperative, and postoperative event variables were obtained by chart review. The diagnoses and the costs of the readmission event were obtained by chart review and from hospital financial data. Readmission indications were grouped as unrelated or planned readmissions, procedure-specific complications, wound complications, cardiac causes, and other. Univariate analyses of categorical variables were performed with χ or Fisher exact test where appropriate. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

RESULTS

A total of 1,170 patient records were identified. Thirty-day readmission occurred in 112 patients (9.6%). The readmission rate was significantly different between groups: 4.5% in CAS (n = 8/177), 8.5% in CEA (21/246), 5.8% in EVAR (18/312), 11.4% in OAAA (4/35), 15.6% in INFRA (33/212), 13.5% in SUPRA (24/178), and 40% in combined SUPRA and INFRA (4/10) (P < 0.0001). Readmissions were unrelated or planned in 19.6% of patients. Wound complications were the most common readmission diagnoses (36.6%, 41/112).There was a difference in the distribution of readmission indications among procedure groups, with wound complications being predominant in INFRA and SUPRA groups (60.6% and 58.3%, respectively), and cardiac events predominantly in EVAR patients (42%) (P < 0.001). In univariable analysis of predictors of readmission, significant preoperative factors were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal insufficiency, and lower hematocrit. Significant postoperative predictors included any postoperative complication, number of complications, increased length of stay, wound complications, postoperative infections, blood transfusion, and reoperation. The median hospital cost for readmission for wound complications was 29,723 USD (interquartile range 23,841-36,878), and for cardiac complications was 39,784 USD (26,305-46,918). The median cost of readmission for bypass graft occlusion was 33,366 USD (20,530-43,170). The median length of stay also differed depending on the readmission diagnosis and was highest for bypass graft occlusion (8.5 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Readmissions after vascular procedures are associated with high cost and hospital bed utilization. Wound complications continue to be the dominant readmission etiology. The characterization of these costs and risk factors in this study can allow for resource allocation to minimize preventable related readmissions. A significant proportion of readmissions after vascular interventions are planned or unrelated, which should be taken into consideration in metric benchmarking and performance comparisons.

摘要

背景

本研究评估血管外科手术后的再入院诊断及相关住院费用。

方法

回顾性确定2008年1月1日至2013年10月20日期间在一家学术机构接受颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)、颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)、肾下腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术(EVAR)、开放性腹主动脉瘤修复术(OAAA)、腹股沟上血管重建术(SUPRA)或腹股沟下血管重建术(INFRA)后再入院的患者。通过病历审查获取人口统计学、术前和术后事件变量。通过病历审查和医院财务数据获取再入院事件的诊断和费用。再入院指征分为无关或计划内再入院、特定手术并发症、伤口并发症、心脏原因及其他。对分类变量进行单因素分析,适当情况下采用χ检验或Fisher精确检验。连续变量采用Wilcoxon秩和检验进行分析。

结果

共识别出1170份患者记录。112例患者(9.6%)发生30天再入院。各手术组间再入院率差异显著:CAS组为4.5%(n = 8/177),CEA组为8.5%(21/246),EVAR组为5.8%(18/312),OAAA组为11.4%(4/35),INFRA组为15.6%(33/212),SUPRA组为13.5%(24/178),SUPRA与INFRA联合组为40%(4/10)(P < 0.0001)。19.6%的患者再入院为无关或计划内。伤口并发症是最常见的再入院诊断(36.6%,41/112)。各手术组间再入院指征分布存在差异,伤口并发症在INFRA组和SUPRA组中占主导(分别为60.6%和58.3%),心脏事件在EVAR患者中占主导(42%)(P < 0.001)。在再入院预测因素的单因素分析中,术前显著因素为慢性阻塞性肺疾病、肾功能不全和较低的血细胞比容。术后显著预测因素包括任何术后并发症、并发症数量、住院时间延长、伤口并发症、术后感染、输血和再次手术。伤口并发症再入院的中位住院费用为29,723美元(四分位间距23,841 - 36,878美元),心脏并发症为39,784美元(26,305 - 46,918美元)。旁路移植血管闭塞再入院的中位费用为33,366美元(20,530 - 43,170美元)。中位住院时间也因再入院诊断而异,旁路移植血管闭塞最长(8.5天)。

结论

血管手术后的再入院与高费用和医院床位利用相关。伤口并发症仍然是主要的再入院病因。本研究中对这些费用和危险因素的描述有助于进行资源分配,以尽量减少可预防的相关再入院。血管介入术后相当一部分再入院是计划内或无关的,在指标基准化和绩效比较中应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
The Readmission Event after Vascular Surgery: Causes and Costs.血管手术后的再入院事件:原因与成本
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;36:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.02.024. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
2
Comparison of 30-day readmission rates and risk factors between carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy.颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的30天再入院率及危险因素比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1432-1444.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.097. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
3
Cost analysis of vascular readmissions after common vascular procedures.常见血管手术后血管再入院的成本分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Nov;62(5):1281-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.05.037. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
4
Endovascular Repair of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Results in Higher Hospital Expenses than Open Surgical Repair: Evidence from a Tertiary Hospital in Brazil.肾下腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复术导致的住院费用高于开放手术修复术:来自巴西一家三级医院的证据。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;36:44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.03.016. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
5
Indications, risk factors, and outcomes of 30-day readmission after infrarenal abdominal aneurysm repair.肾下腹部动脉瘤修复术后 30 天再入院的适应证、风险因素和结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Mar;67(3):747-758.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.106. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
Unplanned readmissions after vascular surgery.血管外科手术后的非计划性再入院。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;59(2):473-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
7
Factors that affect cost and clinical outcome of endovascular aortic repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm.影响腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术成本和临床结果的因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Apr;65(4):997-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.08.090. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
8
Readmissions after complex aneurysm repair are frequent, costly, and primarily at nonindex hospitals.复杂动脉瘤修复术后再入院情况频繁、费用高昂,且主要发生在非索引医院。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Dec;60(6):1429-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.092. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
9
Outcomes and cost of fenestrated versus standard endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm in the United States.美国完整腹主动脉瘤的开窗与标准血管内修复的结果和成本。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Apr;69(4):1036-1044.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.211. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of chimney/snorkel versus fenestrated endovascular repair for high-risk patients with complex abdominal aortic pathologies.烟囱/烟囱式技术与开窗式血管腔内修复术治疗复杂腹主动脉病变高危患者的成本效益分析
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2020 Feb;61(1):18-23. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.19.11146-9. Epub 2019 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Midterm Readmissions and Related Costs after Open and Endovascular Procedures for Aorto-Iliac Occlusive Disease.主-髂动脉闭塞性疾病开放手术与血管腔内治疗术后中期再入院情况及相关费用分析
Life (Basel). 2024 Jun 25;14(7):798. doi: 10.3390/life14070798.
2
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Financial Impact of 30-Day Readmissions for Selected Medical Conditions: A Focus on Hospital Quality Performance.特定医疗状况30天再入院财务影响的系统评价与Meta分析:聚焦医院质量绩效
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 29;12(7):750. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12070750.
3
There and back again: analyzing the effect of outpatient readmission on the quality of life of patients attending a rheumatology clinic.
往返之间:分析门诊再入院对风湿科门诊患者生活质量的影响。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021 Jul 31;13:1759720X211034867. doi: 10.1177/1759720X211034867. eCollection 2021.
4
Defining the 90-day cost structure of lower extremity revascularization for alternative payment model assessment.定义下肢血运重建的 90 天成本结构,以评估替代支付模式。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;73(2):662-673.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.050. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
5
Risk factors associated with 30-day hospital readmission after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术 30 天后住院再入院的相关风险因素。
Vascular. 2021 Feb;29(1):61-68. doi: 10.1177/1708538120937955. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
6
Targeted Intravenous Nanoparticle Delivery: Role of Flow and Endothelial Glycocalyx Integrity.靶向静脉内纳米颗粒递送:血流和内皮糖萼完整性的作用。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Jul;48(7):1941-1954. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02474-4. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
7
Outpatient Readmission in Rheumatology: A Machine Learning Predictive Model of Patient's Return to the Clinic.风湿病门诊再入院:患者返回诊所的机器学习预测模型
J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 2;8(8):1156. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081156.
8
Association of Frailty and Postoperative Complications With Unplanned Readmissions After Elective Outpatient Surgery.虚弱与术后并发症与择期门诊手术后非计划性再入院的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e194330. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4330.
9
Cohort study of risk factors for 30-day readmission after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.腹主动脉瘤修复术后30天再入院危险因素的队列研究。
Vasa. 2019 May;48(3):251-261. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000767. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
10
Examining variation in Medicare payments and drivers of cost for carotid endarterectomy.研究医疗保险支付的差异以及颈动脉内膜切除术的成本驱动因素。
J Surg Res. 2018 Aug;228:299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.033. Epub 2018 Apr 14.