Antcliff Deborah, Campbell Malcolm, Woby Steve, Keeley Philip
Departments of *Physiotherapy ‡Research and Development, The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, North Manchester General Hospital †School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester §Department of Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
Clin J Pain. 2017 Mar;33(3):205-214. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000401.
Activity pacing has been associated with both improved and worsened symptoms, and its role in reducing disability among patients with long-term conditions has been questioned. However, existing studies have measured pacing according to unidimensional subscales, and therefore the empirical evidence for pacing as a multifaceted construct remains unclear. We have developed a 26-item Activity Pacing Questionnaire (APQ-26) for chronic pain/fatigue containing 5 themes of pacing: activity adjustment, activity consistency, activity progression, activity planning, and activity acceptance.
To assess the associations between the 5 APQ-26 pacing themes and symptoms of pain, physical fatigue, depression, avoidance, and physical function.
Cross-sectional questionnaire study design. Data analyzed using multiple regression.
A total of 257 adult patients with diagnoses of chronic low back pain, chronic widespread pain, fibromyalgia, and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis.
Hierarchical multiple regression showed that activity adjustment was significantly associated with increased physical fatigue, depression, and avoidance, but decreased physical function (all Ps≤0.030). Activity consistency was associated with decreased pain, physical fatigue, depression, and avoidance, but increased physical function (all Ps≤0.003). Activity planning was associated with reduced physical fatigue (Ps=0.025) and activity acceptance was associated with increased avoidance (Ps=0.036).
Some APQ-26 pacing themes were associated with worse symptoms and others with symptom improvement. Specifically, pacing themes involving adjusting/reducing activities were associated with worse symptoms, whereas pacing themes involving undertaking consistent activities were associated with improved symptoms. Future study will explore the causality of these associations to add clarification regarding the effects of pacing on patients' symptoms.
活动节奏调整与症状改善及恶化均有关联,其在减少慢性病患者残疾方面的作用也受到质疑。然而,现有研究是根据单维度子量表来衡量节奏调整的,因此,作为一个多方面概念的节奏调整的实证证据仍不明确。我们针对慢性疼痛/疲劳开发了一份包含26个条目的活动节奏调整问卷(APQ - 26),其中包含节奏调整的5个主题:活动调整、活动一致性、活动进展、活动规划和活动接受度。
评估APQ - 26的5个节奏调整主题与疼痛、身体疲劳、抑郁、回避行为及身体功能症状之间的关联。
横断面问卷调查研究设计。采用多元回归分析数据。
共有257名成年患者,诊断为慢性下腰痛、慢性广泛性疼痛、纤维肌痛和慢性疲劳综合征/肌痛性脑脊髓炎。
分层多元回归显示,活动调整与身体疲劳、抑郁和回避行为增加显著相关,但与身体功能下降相关(所有P值≤0.030)。活动一致性与疼痛、身体疲劳、抑郁和回避行为减少相关,但与身体功能增加相关(所有P值≤0.003)。活动规划与身体疲劳减轻相关(P = 0.025),活动接受度与回避行为增加相关(P = 0.036)。
APQ - 26的一些节奏调整主题与更差的症状相关,而其他主题与症状改善相关。具体而言,涉及调整/减少活动的节奏调整主题与更差的症状相关,而涉及进行一致活动的节奏调整主题与症状改善相关。未来的研究将探讨这些关联的因果关系,以进一步阐明节奏调整对患者症状的影响。