Jeffrey I W, Pitts N B
J Dent. 1989 Apr;17(2):55-60. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(89)90130-9.
This paper attempts to elicit from the literature evidence to guide the clinician in deciding what degree of finishing and polishing is appropriate for amalgam restorations. Much of the justification for the polishing of amalgams has, in the past, been empirically based. Comprehensive scientific investigation into the validity of this practice does, however, present a number of methodological problems which have yet to be successfully overcome. An attempt is made to define what is meant by the term 'polished' (in a clinical context) while the benefits of polishing, as far as they are known, are discussed. The roles that cavity preparation, carving and burnishing play in the finishing of a restoration are reviewed, as is the conflicting evidence regarding their respective advantages and disadvantages. The importance of marginal adaptation, the relationship of polishing to secondary caries, and the dilemma in choosing (in appropriate cases) between the replacement of a restoration or its improvement by polishing are also considered.
本文旨在从文献中获取证据,以指导临床医生决定何种程度的修整和抛光适用于银汞合金修复体。过去,银汞合金抛光的许多理由都是基于经验的。然而,对这种做法有效性的全面科学调查确实存在一些尚未成功克服的方法学问题。本文试图定义(在临床背景下)“抛光”一词的含义,同时讨论已知的抛光益处。回顾了窝洞预备、雕刻和打磨在修复体修整中的作用,以及关于它们各自优缺点的相互矛盾的证据。还考虑了边缘适应性的重要性、抛光与继发龋的关系,以及在(适当情况下)选择更换修复体还是通过抛光改善修复体时的困境。