Takahashi Mutsumi, Satoh Yoshihide, Iwasaki Shin-Ichi
Department of Physiology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, Niigata, Japan.
Dent Traumatol. 2017 Apr;33(2):106-109. doi: 10.1111/edt.12291. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
The aim of this study was to examine the effect of thermal shrinkage, which occurs during thermoforming of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) sheets on the thickness of mouthguards fabricated by pressure formation.
Mouthguards were fabricated from 4.0-mm-thick EVA sheets by utilizing a pressure-forming machine. Two molding conditions were compared: The sheets were placed in the thermoforming machine with the sheet extrusion direction either vertical or parallel to the model's center line. The working model was trimmed to the height of 20 mm at the cutting edge of the maxillary central incisor and 15 mm at the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar. The sheet was pressed against the working model for 2 min where the center of the softened sheet sagged 15 mm lower than the clamp. After fabrication, the thickness of mouthguard sheets was determined for the incisal (incisal edge and labial surface) and molar (cusp and buccal surface) portions, and dimensional measurements were made. Differences in molded mouthguard thickness with the sheet orientation of extruded sheets were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-test.
In comparison with the parallel axis orientation, the sheets in vertical orientation with the model's centerline yielded significantly higher thickness measurements at the incisal edge, labial surface, and the cusp (P < 0.01, respectively).
The results suggest that the EVA sheet produced by extrusion molding in vertical axis orientation with the model's centerline can effectively reduce loss of thickness in mouthguards after pressure formation.
本研究的目的是检验乙烯醋酸乙烯酯(EVA)片材热成型过程中发生的热收缩对通过压力成型制造的口腔防护器厚度的影响。
使用压力成型机由4.0毫米厚的EVA片材制造口腔防护器。比较了两种成型条件:将片材以片材挤出方向垂直或平行于模型中心线的方式放置在热成型机中。将工作模型在上颌中切牙的切缘处修剪至20毫米的高度,在上颌第一磨牙的近中颊尖处修剪至15毫米的高度。将片材压在工作模型上2分钟,此时软化片材的中心比夹具低15毫米下垂。制造后,测定口腔防护器片材在切牙(切缘和唇面)和磨牙(牙尖和颊面)部分的厚度,并进行尺寸测量。通过Mann-Whitney U检验分析成型口腔防护器厚度随挤出片材方向的差异。
与平行轴方向相比,与模型中心线垂直方向的片材在切缘、唇面和牙尖处的厚度测量值显著更高(分别为P < 0.01)。
结果表明,与模型中心线垂直轴方向挤出成型生产的EVA片材可有效减少压力成型后口腔防护器的厚度损失。