• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙科学生在上颌牙齿拔除时不进行腭部局部麻醉浸润:一项随机对照试验。

Extraction of maxillary teeth by dental students without palatal infiltration of local anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Khan S R, Qazi S R

机构信息

Institute of Dentistry, CMH Lahore Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Dentistry, CMH Lahore Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.

出版信息

Eur J Dent Educ. 2017 Nov;21(4):e39-e42. doi: 10.1111/eje.12215. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1111/eje.12215
PMID:27324934
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Palatal infiltration of local anaesthesia (LA) for maxillary tooth extractions is painful. One of the techniques for reducing the discomfort of this injection is to avoid it altogether. Given enough time, LA administered only as buccal infiltration diffuses to reach and anaesthetise the palatal tissues. The aim of this double-blind randomised controlled trial was to test the hypothesis that buccal infiltration alone of LA by dental students should be adequate for maxillary tooth extractions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty adult patients presenting for single-tooth maxillary extractions were randomly allocated between two groups. The control group received palatal injections of 0.1 ml 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline, whilst the experimental group received a similar amount of saline (placebo). Extractions performed without further administration of LA were categorised as successful.

RESULTS

Palatal infiltration of lidocaine with adrenaline was significantly more effective than saline (P = 0.002). Overall buccal infiltration alone was successful in 28% patients, with a 40% success rate in the posterior maxilla.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that dental students should, as a matter of routine, extract maxillary teeth with both buccal and palatal infiltration of LA, whilst buccal infiltration alone may be considered in the posterior maxilla.

摘要

目的

对上颌牙齿拔除术进行腭部局部麻醉注射很疼。减少这种注射不适感的一种方法是完全避免它。如果有足够的时间,仅作为颊部浸润给予的局部麻醉剂会扩散并麻醉腭部组织。这项双盲随机对照试验的目的是检验牙科学生仅进行颊部浸润局部麻醉对上颌牙齿拔除术是否足够的假设。

患者与方法

五十名前来进行单颗上颌牙齿拔除术的成年患者被随机分配到两组。对照组接受在腭部注射0.1毫升含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因,而实验组接受等量的生理盐水(安慰剂)。未进一步给予局部麻醉剂而进行的拔牙术被归类为成功。

结果

含肾上腺素的利多卡因腭部浸润明显比生理盐水更有效(P = 0.002)。总体而言,仅颊部浸润在28%的患者中成功,在上颌后部成功率为40%。

结论

结果表明,牙科学生在进行上颌牙齿拔除术时,常规应采用颊部和腭部浸润局部麻醉,而上颌后部仅进行颊部浸润也可考虑。

相似文献

1
Extraction of maxillary teeth by dental students without palatal infiltration of local anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial.牙科学生在上颌牙齿拔除时不进行腭部局部麻醉浸润:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2017 Nov;21(4):e39-e42. doi: 10.1111/eje.12215. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
2
Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.单颊侧浸润麻醉与常规颊侧及腭侧注射麻醉用于上颌恒牙拔除的效率比较
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Mar;107(3):359-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.08.025. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
3
Comparison of articaine and lignocaine for uncomplicated maxillary exodontia.阿替卡因与利多卡因用于单纯性上颌牙拔除术的比较。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015 Mar;25(3):181-4.
4
The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.阿替卡因和利多卡因等效剂量用于上颌磨牙拔除颊侧及非腭侧浸润麻醉的效果:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr;76(4):737-743. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.11.028. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
5
Is palatal injection mandatory prior to extraction of permanent maxillary tooth: a preliminary study.拔除上颌恒牙前腭部注射是否必要:一项初步研究
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Jan-Feb;22(1):100-2. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.80006.
6
A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.比较含 1:100000 肾上腺素的 4%阿替卡因和含 1:80000 肾上腺素的 2%利多卡因在上颌牙髓炎牙齿中实现牙髓麻醉的效果。
J Endod. 2012 Mar;38(3):279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.010. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
7
Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible?不进行腭部注射能拔除上颌恒牙吗?
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Dec;102(6):733-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.005. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
8
Comparison of the effectiveness of lidocaine in permanent maxillary teeth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.利多卡因用于上颌恒牙拔除时单颊侧浸润与常规颊侧及腭侧注射的效果比较。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Jun;14(2):252-7. doi: 10.1007/s12663-014-0624-x. Epub 2014 Apr 27.
9
Extraction of Maxillary Teeth Using Articaine Without a Palatal Injection: A Comparison Between the Anterior and Posterior Regions of the Maxilla.使用阿替卡因不进行腭部注射拔除上颌牙:上颌前部与后部的比较
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jan;75(1):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.192. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
10
Transpapillary versus palatal injection technique for maxillary tooth extractions.上颌牙拔除术中经乳头注射与腭侧注射技术对比
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012 Mar;22(3):143-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Can Single Buccal Infiltration With 4% Articaine Induce Sufficient Analgesia for the Extraction of Maxillary Teeth? A Systematic Literature Review.4%阿替卡因单次颊侧浸润麻醉能否为上颌牙拔除提供足够的镇痛效果?一项系统文献综述。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 5;15(8):e42975. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42975. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Posterior superior alveolar nerve block alone in the extraction of upper third molars: a prospective clinical study.单独使用上牙槽后神经阻滞麻醉在上颌第三磨牙拔除术中的应用:一项前瞻性临床研究
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Aug;23(4):213-220. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.4.213. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
3
Local anesthesia in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A review of current opinion.
口腔颌面外科局部麻醉:当前观点综述
J Dent Sci. 2021 Oct;16(4):1055-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
Anesthetic Efficacy of Single Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine in Extraction of Maxillary 1 Molar.4%阿替卡因和2%利多卡因单次颊侧浸润麻醉在上颌第一磨牙拔除术中的麻醉效果
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul-Dec;9(2):239-246. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_201_18.