Singh Anurag Kumar, Malhotra Hardeep Singh, Garg Ravindra Kumar, Jain Amita, Kumar Neeraj, Kohli Neera, Verma Rajesh, Sharma Praveen Kumar
Department of Neurology, King George Medical University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, PIN-226003, India.
Department of Microbiology, King George Medical University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, India.
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 21;16:306. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1625-9.
Awareness about paradoxical reactions in tuberculous meningitis is crucial as a paradoxical reaction may lead to certain wrong conclusions (for example, an erroneous diagnosis, and a possibility of treatment failure, mycobacterial drug-resistance, drug toxicity, or presence of a malignancy). The present study was planned to evaluate the incidence and predictive factors of paradoxical reactions in light of clinical, cerebrospinal fluid, and neuroimaging characteristics.
In this prospective cohort study, consecutive patients fulfilling the International Consensus criteria of tuberculous meningitis were included. Patients were subjected to clinical evaluation, cerebrospinal fluid evaluation, and neuroimaging. Patients were treated with anti-tuberculosis drugs along with corticosteroids. Patients were regularly followed up at 3 monthly intervals. At each follow up patients were evaluated clinically and repeat cerebrospinal fluid analysis was performed along with repeat neuroimaging. Disability assessment was done using Barthel index.
We enrolled 141 patients of tuberculous meningitis. Approximately one-third of patients (44/141; 31.2 %) developed a paradoxical reaction. Twenty-seven patients developed hydrocephalus, 26 developed tuberculomas, 12 developed optochiasmatic arachnoiditis and 4 patients had spinal arachnoiditis. In 41 patients (out of 44) cerebrospinal fluid paradoxically worsened (increase in cells and/or protein); 2 demonstrated a decrease in cells with polymorph predominance while in one it was normal. In 3 patients, paradoxical cerebrospinal fluid changes were not associated with neuroimaging changes. On multivariate analysis, predictors of paradoxical reaction were female gender (p = 0.013), HIV positivity (p = 0.01) and a shorter duration of illness (p = 0.049). Development of paradoxical reactions did not predict the disability status of the patients.
Paradoxical reaction occurs in approximately one-third of patients with tuberculous meningitis. Female gender, concomitant HIV infection, and a shorter duration of illness were significant predictors. Paradoxical reactions did not adversely affect the outcome.
了解结核性脑膜炎中的矛盾反应至关重要,因为矛盾反应可能导致某些错误结论(例如,错误诊断、治疗失败、分枝杆菌耐药、药物毒性或存在恶性肿瘤的可能性)。本研究旨在根据临床、脑脊液和神经影像学特征评估矛盾反应的发生率和预测因素。
在这项前瞻性队列研究中,纳入了符合结核性脑膜炎国际共识标准的连续患者。对患者进行临床评估、脑脊液评估和神经影像学检查。患者接受抗结核药物联合皮质类固醇治疗。患者每3个月定期随访一次。每次随访时对患者进行临床评估,并重复进行脑脊液分析和神经影像学检查。使用Barthel指数进行残疾评估。
我们纳入了141例结核性脑膜炎患者。约三分之一的患者(44/141;31.2%)出现了矛盾反应。27例患者发生脑积水,26例发生结核瘤,12例发生视交叉蛛网膜炎,4例患者发生脊髓蛛网膜炎。在矛盾反应的44例患者中,41例脑脊液反而恶化(细胞和/或蛋白质增加);2例细胞减少,以多形核细胞为主,1例正常。3例患者脑脊液的矛盾变化与神经影像学变化无关。多因素分析显示,矛盾反应的预测因素为女性(p = 0.013)、HIV阳性(p = 0.01)和病程较短(p = 0.049)。矛盾反应的发生并不能预测患者的残疾状态。
约三分之一的结核性脑膜炎患者会出现矛盾反应。女性、合并HIV感染和病程较短是显著的预测因素。矛盾反应对预后没有不利影响。