Suppr超能文献

拉莫三嗪附加疗法治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫。

Lamotrigine add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

作者信息

Panebianco Mariangela, Bresnahan Rebecca, Ramaratnam Sridharan, Marson Anthony G

机构信息

Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Sciences Centre for Research and Education, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK, L9 7LJ.

The Nerve Centre, Department of Neurology, 5/1 Rajachar Street, T Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 600017.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 20;3(3):CD001909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001909.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review previously published in 2016. Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder, affecting 0.5% to 1% of the population. For nearly 30% of these people, their epilepsy is resistant to currently available drugs. Pharmacological treatment remains the first choice to control epilepsy. Lamotrigine is one of the newer antiepileptic drugs. Lamotrigine, in combination with other antiepileptic drugs (add-on), can reduce seizures, but with some adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of lamotrigine on (1) seizures, (2) adverse-effect profile, and (3) cognition and quality of life, compared to placebo, when used as an add-on treatment for people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

SEARCH METHODS

For the latest update of the review, we searched the following databases on 9 March 2020: Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to March 06, 2020). CRS Web includes randomized or quasi-randomized, controlled trials from PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Specialized Registers of Cochrane Review Groups including Epilepsy. No language restrictions were imposed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised placebo-controlled trials of people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy of any age, in which an adequate method of concealment of randomisation was used. The studies were double-, single- or unblinded, placebo-controlled. For cross-over studies, the first treatment period was treated as a parallel trial. Eligible participants were adults or children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For this update, two review authors independently assessed the trials for inclusion, and extracted data. Outcomes included 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, treatment withdrawal (any reason), adverse effects, effects on cognition and quality of life. Primary analyses were by intention-to-treat. Sensitivity best- and worse-case analyses were undertaken to account for missing outcome data. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% Cls) were estimated for the primary outcomes of seizure frequency and treatment withdrawal. For adverse effects, we calculated pooled RRs and 99% Cls.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not identify any new studies for this update, therefore, the results and conclusions are unchanged. In previous updates of this review, the authors found five parallel add-on studies, eight cross-over studies in adults or children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, and one parallel add-on study with a responder-enriched design in infants. In total, these 14 studies included 1806 eligible participants (38 infants, 199 children, 1569 adults). Baseline phases ranged from four to 12 weeks; treatment phases from eight to 36 weeks. Overall, 11 studies (1243 participants) were rated as having low risk of bias, and three (697 participants) had unclear risk of bias due to lack of reported information around study design. Effective blinding of studies was reported in four studies (563 participants). The overall risk ratio (RR) for 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency was 1.80 (95% CI 1.45 to 2.23; 12 trials, 1322 participants (adults and children); moderate-certainty evidence) indicating that lamotrigine was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing seizure frequency. The overall RR for treatment withdrawal (for any reason) was 1.11 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.37; 14 trials; 1806 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The adverse events significantly associated with lamotrigine were: ataxia, dizziness, diplopia (double vision), and nausea. The RR of these adverse effects were as follows: ataxia 3.34 (99% Cl 2.01 to 5.55; 12 trials; 1525 participants; high-certainty evidence); dizziness 2.00 (99% Cl 1.52 to 2.64;13 trials; 1768 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); diplopia 3.79 (99% Cl 2.15 to 6.68; 3 trials, 944 participants; high-certainty evidence); nausea 1.81 (99% Cl 1.22 to 2.68; 12 studies,1486 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The limited data available precluded any conclusions about effects on cognition and quality of life. No important heterogeneity between studies was found for any of the outcomes. Overall, we assessed the evidence as high to moderate certainty, due to incomplete data for some outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Lamotrigine as an add-on treatment for drug-resistant focal seizures appears to be effective in reducing seizure frequency, and seems to be fairly well-tolerated. However, the trials were of relatively short duration and provided no evidence for the long term. Further trials are needed to assess the long-term effects of lamotrigine, and to compare lamotrigine with other add-on drugs.

摘要

背景

这是对2016年发表的Cochrane系统评价的更新版本。癫痫是一种常见的神经系统疾病,影响着0.5%至1%的人口。在这些人中,近30%的人对目前可用的药物耐药。药物治疗仍然是控制癫痫的首选方法。拉莫三嗪是较新的抗癫痫药物之一。拉莫三嗪与其他抗癫痫药物联合使用(添加治疗)可减少癫痫发作,但会产生一些不良反应。

目的

确定拉莫三嗪作为耐药性局灶性癫痫患者添加治疗药物时,与安慰剂相比,对(1)癫痫发作、(2)不良反应、(3)认知和生活质量的影响。

检索方法

为进行本系统评价的最新更新,我们于2020年3月9日检索了以下数据库:Cochrane研究注册库(CRS网络版)、MEDLINE(Ovid,1946年至2020年3月6日)。CRS网络版包括来自PubMed、EMBASE、ClinicalTrials.gov、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)以及包括癫痫在内的Cochrane系统评价组专业注册库中的随机或半随机对照试验。未设语言限制。

选择标准

针对任何年龄的耐药性局灶性癫痫患者进行的随机安慰剂对照试验,试验采用了适当的随机分配隐藏方法。研究为双盲、单盲或非盲、安慰剂对照。对于交叉研究,将第一个治疗期视为平行试验。符合条件的参与者为患有耐药性局灶性癫痫的成人或儿童。

数据收集与分析

对于本次更新,两名系统评价作者独立评估纳入试验并提取数据。结局指标包括癫痫发作频率降低50%或更多、因任何原因退出治疗、不良反应、对认知和生活质量的影响。主要分析采用意向性分析。进行敏感性最佳和最差情况分析以处理缺失的结局数据。对于癫痫发作频率和退出治疗的主要结局指标,估计合并风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(95%CI)。对于不良反应,我们计算合并RR及99%CI。

主要结果

本次更新未纳入任何新研究,因此结果和结论未变。在本系统评价的先前更新中,作者发现了五项平行添加治疗研究、八项针对耐药性局灶性癫痫成人或儿童的交叉研究以及一项针对婴儿的具有富集应答者设计的平行添加治疗研究。这14项研究总共纳入了1806名符合条件的参与者(38名婴儿、199名儿童、1569名成人)。基线期为4至12周;治疗期为8至36周。总体而言,11项研究(1243名参与者)被评为偏倚风险低,三项研究(697名参与者)因缺乏关于研究设计的报告信息而偏倚风险不明确。四项研究(563名参与者)报告了有效的研究设盲。癫痫发作频率降低50%或更多的总体风险比(RR)为1.80(95%CI 1.45至2.23;12项试验,1322名参与者(成人和儿童);中等确定性证据),表明拉莫三嗪在降低癫痫发作频率方面显著优于安慰剂。因任何原因退出治疗的总体RR为1.11(95%CI 0.91至1.37;14项试验;1806名参与者;中等确定性证据)。与拉莫三嗪显著相关的不良事件有:共济失调、头晕、复视(双眼视物重影)和恶心。这些不良反应的RR如下:共济失调3.34(99%CI 2.01至5.55;12项试验;1525名参与者;高确定性证据);头晕2.00(99%CI 1.52至2.64;13项试验;1768名参与者;中等确定性证据);复视3.79(99%CI 2.15至6.68;3项试验,944名参与者;高确定性证据);恶心1.81(99%CI 1.2至2.68;12项研究,1486名参与者;中等确定性证据)。现有有限数据无法得出关于对认知和生活质量影响的任何结论。未发现各研究在任何结局指标上存在重要异质性。总体而言,由于部分结局指标数据不完整,我们将证据评估为高至中等确定性。

作者结论

拉莫三嗪作为耐药性局灶性癫痫发作的添加治疗药物似乎在降低癫痫发作频率方面有效,且耐受性似乎较好。然而,试验持续时间相对较短,未提供长期证据。需要进一步试验来评估拉莫三嗪的长期效果,并将拉莫三嗪与其他添加治疗药物进行比较。

相似文献

1
Lamotrigine add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 20;3(3):CD001909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001909.pub3.
2
Lamotrigine add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 11;12(12):CD001909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001909.pub4.
3
Lamotrigine add-on for drug-resistant partial epilepsy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 22;2016(6):CD001909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001909.pub2.
4
Gabapentin add-on treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 12;1(1):CD001415. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001415.pub4.
5
Lamotrigine add-on therapy for drug-resistant generalised tonic-clonic seizures.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD007783. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007783.pub3.
6
Pregabalin add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD005612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005612.pub5.
7
Pregabalin add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 9;7(7):CD005612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005612.pub4.
8
Immunomodulatory interventions for focal epilepsy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 16;10(10):CD009945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009945.pub3.
9
Rufinamide add-on therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 8;11(11):CD011772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011772.pub3.
10
Vigabatrin add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 30;7(7):CD007302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007302.pub3.

引用本文的文献

4
Antiepileptic Strategies for Patients with Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024 Mar;25(3):389-403. doi: 10.1007/s11864-024-01182-8. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
5
Lamotrigine add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 11;12(12):CD001909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001909.pub4.
6
Assessment of clinically actionable pharmacogenetic markers to stratify anti-seizure medications.
Pharmacogenomics J. 2023 Nov;23(6):149-160. doi: 10.1038/s41397-023-00313-y. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
8
Effect of Lamotrigine on Ouabain-Induced Arrhythmia in Isolated Atria of Guinea Pigs.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Oct 20;35:138. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.138. eCollection 2021.
9
The effectiveness of antiepileptic drug treatment in glioma patients: lamotrigine versus lacosamide.
J Neurooncol. 2021 Aug;154(1):73-81. doi: 10.1007/s11060-021-03800-z. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
10
Preliminary analysis of the effect of vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of children with intractable epilepsy.
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Dec 6;8(23):5918-5925. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5918.

本文引用的文献

1
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
2
Surgery for epilepsy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 25;6(6):CD010541. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010541.pub3.
3
Gabapentin add-on treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 24;10(10):CD001415. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001415.pub3.
8
The Effect of Lamotrigine and Levetiracetam on TMS-Evoked EEG Responses Depends on Stimulation Intensity.
Front Neurosci. 2017 Oct 20;11:585. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00585. eCollection 2017.
10
ILAE classification of the epilepsies: Position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology.
Epilepsia. 2017 Apr;58(4):512-521. doi: 10.1111/epi.13709. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验