Muchtar Eli, Dagan Adi, Robenshtok Eyal, Shochat Tzippy, Oniashvili Nino, Amitai Irina, Raanani Pia, Magen Hila
Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel.
Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Hematol Oncol. 2017 Dec;35(4):703-710. doi: 10.1002/hon.2303. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
Bone disease is a major cause for morbidity in multiple myeloma (MM), with the main focus concerning the manifestation as osteolytic lesions. Bone mineral loss is another reflection of myeloma bone involvement. Recently, osteoporosis has been omitted as a defining criterion for symptomatic disease in MM. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the use of bone mineral density (BMD) exams by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) among MM patients in a tertiary medical care centre. One-hundred seventy three patients were included. The T-scores of lumbar spine (LS), left femur neck (FN) and left total hip (TH) were obtained and analysed. The extent of osteolytic disease was categorized based on six bony areas. There was a strong correlation between spine and femur's T-scores (r = 0.56-0.61, p < 0.0001), although different sets of variables were correlated with LS and femur's T-scores. There was no correlation between BMD measurements and osteolytic disease extent. Patients with vertebral fracture(s) had significant lower T-scores of the spine in comparison to patients without vertebral fractures. Sixty-three patients (36.4% of the cohort) had follow-up DXA exam. In general, there was an increase in the LS T-scores, while femoral values decreased. However, in patients who achieved complete response (CR) and in those who retained CR during follow-up, femoral BMD increased as well. Because correlation between BMD and the extent of osteolytic lesions was not seen, our data support the recent exclusion of BMD assessment from the definition of symptomatic myeloma. Still, its use should be considered for evaluation of age- or therapy-related osteoporosis. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
骨病是多发性骨髓瘤(MM)发病的主要原因,主要关注点在于其溶骨性病变的表现。骨矿物质流失是骨髓瘤骨受累的另一种表现。最近,骨质疏松已不再作为MM有症状疾病的定义标准。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估在一家三级医疗中心的MM患者中使用双能X线吸收法(DXA)进行骨密度(BMD)检查的情况。共纳入173例患者。获取并分析了腰椎(LS)、左股骨颈(FN)和左全髋(TH)的T值。根据六个骨区域对溶骨性疾病的程度进行分类。尽管与LS和股骨T值相关的变量集不同,但脊柱和股骨的T值之间存在很强的相关性(r = 0.56 - 0.61,p < 0.0001)。BMD测量值与溶骨性疾病程度之间无相关性。与无椎体骨折的患者相比,有椎体骨折的患者脊柱的T值显著更低。63例患者(占队列的36.4%)进行了随访DXA检查。总体而言,LS的T值有所增加,而股骨的值下降。然而,在达到完全缓解(CR)的患者以及在随访期间维持CR的患者中,股骨BMD也有所增加。由于未观察到BMD与溶骨性病变程度之间的相关性,我们的数据支持最近将BMD评估从有症状骨髓瘤的定义中排除。尽管如此,在评估年龄或治疗相关的骨质疏松时仍应考虑使用它。版权所有© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.