Fortin Yvan, Sullivan Richard M
Private Practice, Centre D'Implantologie Dentaire de Quebec, Canada.
Vice President, Clinical Technologies, Nobel Biocare USA LLC.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Feb;19(1):56-68. doi: 10.1111/cid.12433. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
Posterior maxillary tilted implants are gaining prevalence as an alternative to sinus grafts supporting fixed maxillary restorations. This paper reports long-term results after loading using this technique.
Consecutive patients presenting for either routine hygiene maintenance or unplanned emergency care who had received tilted implants as a sinus graft alternative to support fixed fully implant-supported restoration of an edentulous maxilla and were followed for a minimum of 10 years from initial implant placement were included in this evaluation.
Forty-four patients were identified: 40 with bilateral tilted implants and 4 with one tilted and one axial posterior implant. Eight patients received one-piece fixed porcelain-to-gold screw-retained restorations, and thirty-six patients received a fully implant-supported patient-removable Marius Bridge. Seventy-nine out of 84 originally loaded posterior tilted implants survived a minimum of 10 years loading; one tilted implant was lost at 10 years. Eight additional posterior implants were placed for either these lost tilted posterior implants or as proactive supplemental support; one of these replacement tilted implants survived for at least 10 years and is included in the data. All patients have maintained continuous fixed function throughout the follow-up period. Forty-one out of 44 patients continue with the original restoration, 33 without modification or removal of the fixed restoration or implant-connecting bar. One porcelain-to-gold and seven Marius Bridges had framework modifications to accommodate additional implants; 3 Marius Bridge restorations were replaced with a newer generation.
Within the limits of this retrospective study, the results show that continuous fixed function of fully implant-supported maxillary restorations using posterior tilted implants in terminal positions of support as a sinus graft alternative combined with axial anterior implants is possible over a prolonged period. Loss of a posterior tilted implant after loading is treatable with another tilted, zygomatic or axial implant, typically requiring only modification of the fixed restoration.
上颌后倾种植体作为支持上颌固定修复的窦底植骨替代方法正日益普及。本文报告了采用该技术加载后的长期结果。
纳入连续的患者,这些患者因常规口腔卫生维护或意外急诊前来就诊,他们接受了后倾种植体作为窦底植骨的替代方法,以支持无牙上颌的完全种植支持固定修复,且从最初种植体植入起至少随访10年。
共确定44例患者:40例双侧后倾种植体,4例一侧后倾种植体和一侧轴向种植体。8例患者接受了一体式固定烤瓷-金螺丝固位修复体,36例患者接受了完全种植支持的患者可摘式Marius桥。84颗最初加载的后倾种植体中有79颗存活至少10年;1颗后倾种植体在10年时丢失。为这些丢失的后倾种植体或作为预防性补充支持又植入了8颗后倾种植体;其中1颗替代后倾种植体存活至少10年并纳入数据。所有患者在随访期间均保持持续的固定功能。44例患者中有41例继续使用原始修复体,33例未对固定修复体或种植体连接杆进行修改或拆除。1个烤瓷-金修复体和7个Marius桥的框架进行了修改以容纳额外的种植体;3个Marius桥修复体被新一代修复体替换。
在本回顾性研究的范围内,结果表明,在上颌末端位置使用后倾种植体作为窦底植骨替代方法并结合轴向种植体,完全种植支持的上颌修复体在较长时间内实现持续固定功能是可行的。加载后后倾种植体的丢失可用另一个后倾、颧骨或轴向种植体进行治疗,通常仅需对固定修复体进行修改。