López-López Almudena, González José, Guerrero Ángel L, Ordás Carlos M, Muñoz Irene, Cuadrado María
Department of Medicine and Surgery, Psychology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
Departments of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Pain Med. 2017 Jan 1;18(1):152-160. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw130.
The aim of the present work is to analyze certain psychological features in a group of patients diagnosed with Epicrania fugax (EF; that has been recently included in the appendix of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition, beta version), as well as their association with diverse demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample.
Case-control.
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Stress Coping (COPE), Big Five Personality Traits (NEO-FFI), Depression (BDI-II), and Trait Anxiety (STAI) were evaluated in 23 patients with EF and 23 matched healthy controls. Differences between EF patients and controls were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Differences in psychological features as a function of the demographic and clinical characteristics were examined using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Mann-Whitney U test, or Pearson's correlations.
The two groups differed significantly from each other in Denial, Trait anxiety, and Depression. Low-frequency epicrania patients scored significantly higher than controls in Perceived stress, Neuroticism, Denial, Self-blame, Trait anxiety, and Depression and higher than high-frequency EF in Venting.
The results initially suggest the absence of substantial differences between patients suffering of EF and healthy controls. On the contrary, low-frequency EF patients show a distinctive "negative (unhealthy) psychological profile," in opposition to high-frequency EF patients. This circumstance highlights the potential need to consider low- frequency EF patients as a target for psychological intervention in combination with the most common medical procedures. Longitudinal studies are necessary to correctly elucidate the influence of these psychological variables on the course of EF.
本研究旨在分析一组被诊断为短暂性头皮痛(EF,最近已被纳入《国际头痛疾病分类》第三版β版附录)患者的某些心理特征,以及这些特征与样本的不同人口统计学和临床特征之间的关联。
病例对照研究。
对23例EF患者和23例匹配的健康对照者进行感知压力量表(PSS)、压力应对(COPE)、大五人格特质(NEO-FFI)、抑郁(BDI-II)和特质焦虑(STAI)评估。采用曼-惠特尼U检验分析EF患者与对照者之间的差异。使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)、曼-惠特尼U检验或皮尔逊相关性分析心理特征随人口统计学和临床特征的差异。
两组在否认、特质焦虑和抑郁方面存在显著差异。低频头皮痛患者在感知压力、神经质、否认、自责、特质焦虑和抑郁方面的得分显著高于对照组,在宣泄方面的得分高于高频EF患者。
结果初步表明,EF患者与健康对照者之间没有实质性差异。相反,低频EF患者呈现出独特的“消极(不健康)心理 profile”,与高频EF患者不同。这种情况凸显了将低频EF患者作为心理干预目标并结合最常见医疗程序的潜在必要性。需要进行纵向研究以正确阐明这些心理变量对EF病程的影响。