Hedgecoe Adam
Cardiff University, UK.
Sociology. 2016 Jun;50(3):486-501. doi: 10.1177/0038038515590756. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
Drawing on scholarship around academic freedom and new public management, this article explores the way in which research ethics committees in UK universities (URECs) can come to exhibit behaviour - common in their US equivalents - that prioritises the reputational protection of their host institution over and above academic freedom and the protection of research subjects. Drawing on two case studies the article shows both how URECs can serve to restrict research that may be 'embarrassing' for a university and how, in high profile cases, university management come to use such committees as mechanisms for internal discipline.
本文借鉴了关于学术自由和新公共管理的学术研究成果,探讨了英国大学研究伦理委员会(URECs)如何会表现出——类似于美国同行的常见行为——将保护其主办机构的声誉置于学术自由和研究对象保护之上。通过两个案例研究,本文展示了URECs如何能够限制可能令大学“难堪”的研究,以及在备受瞩目的案例中,大学管理层如何将此类委员会用作内部纪律处分的机制。