The mammography debate: the senior years.
作者信息
Kaniklidis C
机构信息
No Surrender Breast Cancer Foundation, Locust Valley, NY, U.S.A.
出版信息
Curr Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(3):e162-4. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3257. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The mammography debate: the senior years.乳腺钼靶检查之争：老年阶段
Curr Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(3):e162-4. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3257. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
2
Computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammography: does it help the junior or the senior radiologist?乳腺钼靶摄影中的计算机辅助检测（CAD）：它对初级放射科医生还是高级放射科医生有帮助？
Eur J Radiol. 2005 Apr;54(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.11.021.
3
Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective.超越乳房X光检查的争论：一种适度的观点。
Curr Oncol. 2015 Jun;22(3):220-9. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2585.
4
Debate among researchers over mammography screening and the potential effect of that debate on screening in the United States.研究人员之间关于乳房X光检查筛查的争论以及该争论对美国筛查的潜在影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jan 16;100(2):156. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm319. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
5
Strategies to encourage mammography use among women in senior citizens' housing facilities.鼓励老年居住设施中的女性进行乳房X光检查的策略。
J Cancer Educ. 1998 Summer;13(2):108-15. doi: 10.1080/08858199809528526.
6
Mammography for senior women: an overview.老年女性的乳腺钼靶检查：综述
Del Med J. 1999 Sep;71(9):373-4.
7
Using structured debate to teach a controversial topic: mammography for women in their 40s.运用结构化辩论教授一个有争议的话题：针对40多岁女性的乳腺钼靶检查。
Teach Learn Med. 2006 Fall;18(4):292-6. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1804_3.
8
Diagnosing breast cancer: the mammography debate.诊断乳腺癌：乳房X光检查的争论
J Pract Nurs. 1979 Apr;29(4):18.
9
Mammography at a crossroad. How do physicians reconcile conflicting study results with the biologic truths of breast cancer?乳腺钼靶检查处于十字路口。医生如何将相互矛盾的研究结果与乳腺癌的生物学真相协调起来？
Postgrad Med. 2002 Nov;112(5):11-2, 15. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2002.11.1352.
10
[The value of mammography in patients up to the age of 35].[乳腺钼靶摄影在35岁及以下患者中的价值]
Rofo. 1991 May;154(5):560-2. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1033185.
引用本文的文献
1
Mammography screening and mortality by risk status in the California teachers study.加利福尼亚教师研究中的风险状况与乳腺癌筛查和死亡率。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Dec 18;21(1):1341. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09071-1.
本文引用的文献
1
Response to: "[Miller's] Response to: 'Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective'".对《[米勒的]对〈超越乳房X光检查之争：一种温和观点〉的回应》的回应
Curr Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(3):e324-6. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3113. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
2
Response to: "[Yaffe's] Response to: 'Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective'".对《[亚夫的]对〈超越乳房X光检查之争：一种温和观点〉的回应》的回应。
Curr Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(3):e322-3. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3105. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
3
How Can Advanced Imaging Be Used to Mitigate Potential Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis?先进成像技术如何用于减轻潜在的乳腺癌过度诊断？
Acad Radiol. 2016 Jun;23(6):768-73. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
4
Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.乳腺癌筛查：美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96. doi: 10.7326/M15-2886. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Response to: "Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective".回应：“超越乳腺钼靶检查之争：一种温和的观点”。
Curr Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(5):e401-3. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2578.
6
To screen or not to screen for breast cancer? How do modelling studies answer the question?是否进行乳腺癌筛查？建模研究如何回答这个问题？
Curr Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(5):e380-2. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2889.
7
Breast cancer screening panels continue to confuse the facts and inject their own biases.乳腺癌筛查小组继续混淆事实并注入他们自己的偏见。
Curr Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(5):e376-9. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2880.
8
Utilization of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening.磁共振成像在乳腺癌筛查中的应用。
Curr Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(5):e332-5. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2882.
9
Has screening mammography become obsolete?乳腺钼靶筛查是否已过时？
Curr Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(5):e328-31. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2879.
10
CJS debate: Is mammography useful in average-risk screening for breast cancer?CJS 辩论：乳腺钼靶检查对平均风险乳腺癌筛查有用吗？
Can J Surg. 2016 Feb;59(1):62-6. doi: 10.1503/cjs.017514.
Zotero 插件