Dijkstra Siebren, Witjes Wim P J, Roos Erik P M, Vijverberg Peter L M, Geboers Arno D H, Bruins Jos L, Smits Geert A H J, Vergunst Henk, Mulders Peter F A
Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Urology, Antonius Hospital, Bolswarderbaan 1, P.O. Box 20.000, 8600 BA Sneek, The Netherlands.
Springerplus. 2016 May 17;5:653. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2280-8. eCollection 2016.
Compare the efficacy and tolerability of dutasteride in combination with bicalutamide to bicalutamide monotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa).
One-hundred-fifty PCa patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either bicalutamide monotherapy 150 mg once daily (79 patients) or bicalutamide 150 mg plus dutasteride 0.5 mg once daily (71 patients). Treatment response was assessed by serum PSA level measurement, and standard procedures for diagnosis of clinical progression were used during follow-up. Patient-reported quality of life (QoL) was assessed using validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25).
At 3 years follow-up, PSA progression was found in 52 patients [65.8 %; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 55.4-76.3] in the monotherapy group compared to 38 patients (53.5 %; 95 % CI 41.9-65.1) in the combined therapy group (p = 0.134). At the time of analysis 37 men (46.8 %; 95 % CI 35.8-57.8) in the monotherapy group had died versus 30 men (42.3 %; 95 % CI 30.8-53.7) in the combined therapy group. Median survival time was 5.4 and 5.8 years, respectively (p = 0.694). There was no statistically significant difference in the presentation frequency of adverse events between groups (p = 0.683). QoL was good and comparable between the two groups.
Both therapies were well tolerated with a good QoL. However, despite a trend toward higher efficacy of the combined therapy, progression-free survival and overall survival was not significantly different between the groups. Further research on this therapy should be performed.
比较度他雄胺联合比卡鲁胺与比卡鲁胺单药治疗局部晚期和转移性前列腺癌(PCa)的疗效和耐受性。
前瞻性纳入150例局部晚期或转移性PCa患者,随机分为两组,分别接受比卡鲁胺单药治疗(每日1次,每次150 mg,共79例患者)或比卡鲁胺150 mg加度他雄胺0.5 mg每日1次(共71例患者)。通过检测血清PSA水平评估治疗反应,随访期间采用标准程序诊断临床进展。使用经过验证的问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30和QLQ-PR25)评估患者报告的生活质量(QoL)。
在3年的随访中,单药治疗组有52例患者(65.8%;95%置信区间[CI] 55.4 - 76.3)出现PSA进展,而联合治疗组为38例患者(53.5%;95% CI 41.9 - 65.1)(p = 0.134)。在分析时,单药治疗组有37名男性(46.8%;95% CI 35.8 - 57.8)死亡,联合治疗组为30名男性(42.3%;95% CI 30.8 - 53.7)。中位生存时间分别为5.4年和5.8年(p = 0.694)。两组之间不良事件的发生频率无统计学显著差异(p = 0.683)。两组的QoL均良好且相当。
两种治疗方法耐受性良好,QoL也良好。然而,尽管联合治疗有更高疗效的趋势,但两组之间的无进展生存期和总生存期并无显著差异。应进一步开展关于这种治疗方法的研究。