Suppr超能文献

根治性前列腺切除术对癌症控制和功能结局的长期影响的批判性分析。

A critical analysis of the long-term impact of radical prostatectomy on cancer control and function outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mayo Medical School and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):664-75. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.053. Epub 2011 Dec 7.

Abstract

CONTEXT

The optimal management strategy for men with newly diagnosed clinically localized prostate cancer remains a matter of debate. Numerous series have reported cancer control and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes following treatment with radical prostatectomy (RP).

OBJECTIVE

Critically review published oncologic and functional outcomes after RP, and evaluate factors associated with these outcome measures.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A review of the literature was performed using the Medline and Web of Sciences databases. Relevant reports published between 1980 and 2011 identified using the keywords prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy, prostate-specific antigen, biochemical recurrence, incontinence, and erectile dysfunction were reviewed and summarized.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Cancer control rates following RP largely depend on the definition of treatment efficacy. While up to 40% of men have been reported to experience postoperative biochemical recurrence on long-term follow-up, death from prostate cancer has been noted in <10% of men at 15 yr after surgery in contemporary series. For men with high-risk disease, surgery affords pathologic staging, thereby facilitating the selective application of secondary therapies, and has been associated with decreased mortality risk versus radiation in retrospective series. Reported functional outcomes after surgery, particularly urinary continence and erectile dysfunction, have varied greatly to date. These assessments have been limited by nonstandardized reporting methodology. The use of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has increased in recent years, and while follow-up is thus far short, available data do not suggest the superiority of either approach in terms of functional or oncologic outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

RP is associated with excellent long-term cancer control. Continued efforts to conduct prospective assessments of postoperative functional outcomes are necessary using validated QoL instruments. The importance of surgical approach will also require further study, incorporating comparative oncologic, functional, and economic data.

摘要

背景

对于新诊断为局限性前列腺癌的男性,其最佳治疗策略仍存在争议。大量研究报告了根治性前列腺切除术(RP)治疗后的癌症控制和生活质量(QoL)结果。

目的

批判性地回顾 RP 后的肿瘤学和功能结果,并评估与这些结果相关的因素。

证据获取

通过 Medline 和 Web of Sciences 数据库进行文献回顾。使用前列腺癌、根治性前列腺切除术、前列腺特异性抗原、生化复发、尿失禁和勃起功能障碍等关键词,检索并总结了 1980 年至 2011 年期间发表的相关报告。

证据综合

RP 后的癌症控制率在很大程度上取决于治疗效果的定义。虽然在长期随访中有多达 40%的男性报告术后发生生化复发,但在当代系列研究中,手术后 15 年死于前列腺癌的男性<10%。对于高危疾病的男性,手术可提供病理分期,从而有助于选择性应用辅助治疗,并与回顾性系列研究中的放射治疗相比降低了死亡率风险。迄今为止,手术后的功能结果(尤其是尿控和勃起功能障碍)报告差异很大。这些评估受到非标准化报告方法的限制。近年来,机器人辅助 RP 的应用有所增加,虽然随访时间尚短,但现有数据并未表明这两种方法在功能或肿瘤学结果方面具有优势。

结论

RP 与良好的长期癌症控制相关。需要使用经过验证的 QoL 工具,继续努力进行术后功能结果的前瞻性评估。手术方法的重要性也需要进一步研究,包括比较肿瘤学、功能和经济学数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验