Cassidy Jessica M, Chu Haitao, Chen Mo, Kimberley Teresa J, Carey James R
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Programs in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Neuromodulation. 2016 Dec;19(8):838-847. doi: 10.1111/ner.12459. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
Reliable transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures for probing corticomotor excitability are important when assessing the physiological effects of noninvasive brain stimulation. The primary objective of this study was to examine test-retest reliability of an interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) index measurement in stroke.
Ten subjects with chronic stroke (≥6 months) completed two IHI testing sessions per week for three weeks (six testing sessions total). A single investigator measured IHI in the contra-to-ipsilesional primary motor cortex direction and in the opposite direction using bilateral paired-pulse TMS. Weekly sessions were separated by 24 hours with a 1-week washout period separating testing weeks. To determine if motor-evoked potential (MEP) quantification method affected measurement reliability, IHI indices computed from both MEP amplitude and area responses were found. Reliability was assessed with two-way, mixed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC ). Standard error of measurement and minimal detectable difference statistics were also determined.
With the exception of the initial testing week, IHI indices measured in the contra-to-ipsilesional hemisphere direction demonstrated moderate to excellent reliability (ICC = 0.725-0.913). Ipsi-to-contralesional IHI indices depicted poor or invalid reliability estimates throughout the three-week testing duration (ICC= -1.153-0.105). The overlap of ICC 95% confidence intervals suggested that IHI indices using MEP amplitude vs. area measures did not differ with respect to reliability.
IHI indices demonstrated varying magnitudes of reliability irrespective of MEP quantification method. Several strategies for improving IHI index measurement reliability are discussed.
在评估非侵入性脑刺激的生理效应时,用于探测皮质运动兴奋性的可靠经颅磁刺激(TMS)测量方法很重要。本研究的主要目的是检验中风患者半球间抑制(IHI)指数测量的重测信度。
10名慢性中风(≥6个月)患者每周完成两次IHI测试,共持续三周(总计六次测试)。由一名研究人员使用双侧配对脉冲TMS在患侧至健侧初级运动皮层方向以及相反方向测量IHI。每周的测试相隔24小时,测试周之间有1周的洗脱期。为了确定运动诱发电位(MEP)量化方法是否影响测量信度,分别根据MEP波幅和面积反应计算了IHI指数。采用双向混合组内相关系数(ICC)评估信度。还确定了测量标准误和最小可检测差异统计量。
除了最初的测试周外,在患侧至健侧半球方向测量的IHI指数显示出中度至极好的信度(ICC = 0.725 - 0.913)。在整个三周的测试期间,健侧至患侧的IHI指数显示出较差或无效的信度估计(ICC = -1.153 - 0.105)。ICC 95%置信区间的重叠表明,使用MEP波幅与面积测量的IHI指数在信度方面没有差异。
无论MEP量化方法如何,IHI指数的信度大小各不相同。讨论了几种提高IHI指数测量信度的策略。