• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于牙种植体支持单冠修复的成功率、存留率及并发症发生率的五年回顾性研究

Five-year retrospective study on success, survival and incidence of complications of single crowns supported by dental implants.

作者信息

Tey Valerie H S, Phillips Rachel, Tan Ken

机构信息

National Dental Centre, Singapore, Singapore.

Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 May;28(5):620-625. doi: 10.1111/clr.12843. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1111/clr.12843
PMID:27334865
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the survival and the incidence of biologic and technical complications of implant-supported single crowns after 5 years of function.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients treated with dental implants at the National Dental Centre, Singapore, from 2006 to 2010 were recruited from the Implant Registry and evaluated by two clinicians. One hundred and ninety-four patients, with 266 implant single crowns (SCs), were examined clinically for biologic and technical parameters. Digital radiographs were also obtained. Failure and complication rates were calculated based on the person-time at risk.

RESULTS

The mean biologic time in function was 5.9 ± 1.3 years. None of the implants had been lost, resulting in a 5-year survival of 100%. The corresponding success (complication-free) rate was 92.9% (95% CI: 89.2, 95.4). The mean prosthetic time in function was 5.2 ± 1.5 years, with a 5-year survival of implant-supported SCs of 98.2% (95% CI: 95.8, 99.3). The corresponding success rate was 88.9% (95% CI: 84.8, 92.0). The 5-year incidence of biologic complications, defined as PPD ≥6 mm with bleeding on probing/suppuration, in the presence of ≥2.5 mm of radiographic bone loss, was 7.1% (95% CI: 4.6, 10.9). The 5-year incidence of technical complications was 6.5% (95% CI: 3.9, 10.7) for fracture of the veneering material, 4.3% (95% CI: 2.4, 7.7) for loss of retention, 2.1% (95% CI: 1.0, 4.7) for abutment screw loosening and 0.4% (95% CI: 0.1, 2.5) for abutment fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

High survival rates (98.4%) for both the single tooth implants and the respective single crowns were demonstrated after 5.2 ± 1.5 years. However, the success rates were considerably lower (84.9%), indicating that biologic and technical complications were frequent.

摘要

目的

确定种植体支持的单冠在功能行使5年后的存留率以及生物学和技术并发症的发生率。

材料与方法

从新加坡国立牙科中心2006年至2010年接受牙种植治疗的患者中,从种植体登记处招募患者,并由两名临床医生进行评估。对194例患者的266颗种植单冠(SCs)进行临床生物学和技术参数检查。还获取了数字化X线片。根据风险人时计算失败率和并发症发生率。

结果

功能行使的平均生物学时间为5.9±1.3年。无一例种植体丢失,5年存留率为100%。相应的成功率(无并发症)为92.9%(95%可信区间:89.2,95.4)。功能行使的平均修复时间为5.2±1.5年,种植体支持的单冠5年存留率为98.2%(95%可信区间:95.8,99.3)。相应的成功率为88.9%(95%可信区间:84.8,92.0)。生物学并发症的5年发生率,定义为探诊深度≥6 mm且探诊出血/有溢脓,同时存在≥2.5 mm的影像学骨吸收,为7.1%(95%可信区间:4.6,10.9)。技术并发症的5年发生率,贴面材料骨折为6.5%(95%可信区间:3.9,10.7),固位丧失为4.3%(95%可信区间:2.4,7.7),基台螺丝松动为2.1%(95%可信区间:1.0,4.7),基台骨折为0.4%(95%可信区间:0.1,2.5)。

结论

在5.2±1.5年后,单颗牙种植体和相应单冠均显示出较高的存留率(98.4%)。然而,成功率要低得多(84.9%),表明生物学和技术并发症很常见。

相似文献

1
Five-year retrospective study on success, survival and incidence of complications of single crowns supported by dental implants.关于牙种植体支持单冠修复的成功率、存留率及并发症发生率的五年回顾性研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 May;28(5):620-625. doi: 10.1111/clr.12843. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
2
A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.私人诊所种植治疗及并发症的5年回顾性分析:单颗及短跨度种植支持固定义齿的修复并发症
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Sep-Oct;29(5):435-44. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4794.
3
Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years.系统评价:纵向研究中,对经过 5 年平均随访的种植体单冠的存活率和生物学、技术及美学并发症发生率的研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:2-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x.
4
Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications.过去十年中种植体牙科的进展:较老和较新出版物中存活率和并发症发生率的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:308-24. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g5.2.
5
Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs).牙支持式固定义齿(FDPs)、种植体支持式FDPs及单冠(SCs)的生存率和并发症发生率比较。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:97-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x.
6
Single-Tooth Rehabilitations Supported by Dental Implants Used in an Immediate-Provisionalization Protocol: Report on Long-Term Outcome with Retrospective Follow-Up.即刻临时修复方案中使用的种植牙支持的单颗牙修复:回顾性随访的长期结果报告
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e511-9. doi: 10.1111/cid.12278. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
7
Survival and complication rates of fixed restorations supported by locking-taper implants: a prospective study with 1 to 10 years of follow-up.固位型修复体支持的锁定锥度种植体的存活率和并发症发生率:一项 1 至 10 年随访的前瞻性研究。
J Prosthodont. 2014 Aug;23(6):434-44. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12152. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
8
Prosthetic Complications Affecting Single-Tooth Morse-Taper Connection Implants.影响单颗牙齿莫氏锥度连接种植体的修复并发症
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Nov;29(8):2255-2262. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004495.
9
Complication and failure rates with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and single crowns: a 10-year retrospective study.种植体支持的固定义齿和单冠的并发症及失败率:一项10年回顾性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Jun;16(3):356-64. doi: 10.1111/cid.12066. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
10
Survival rates and complication types for single implants provided at the Melbourne Dental School.墨尔本牙科学院提供的单个种植体的存活率和并发症类型。
Aust Dent J. 2015 Sep;60(3):353-61. doi: 10.1111/adj.12248.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoding success: A five-year retrospective study of dental Implant survival.解读成功:一项关于牙种植体存留率的五年回顾性研究
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Sep-Oct;15(5):948-954. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.06.021. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
A Comparative Evaluation of the Primary and Secondary Stability of Dental Implants with Progressive and Conventional Thread Designs: A Prospective Non-Interventional Study of 100 Implants in 62 Patients.具有渐进式和传统螺纹设计的牙种植体的一级和二级稳定性的比较评估:一项对62例患者的100颗种植体进行的前瞻性非干预性研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 28;14(9):3040. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093040.
3
Effect of cement type, luting protocol, and ceramic abutment material on the shade of cemented titanium-based lithium disilicate crowns and surrounding peri-implant soft tissue: a spectrophotometric analysis.
水泥类型、粘结方案和陶瓷基台材料对粘结钛基二硅酸锂全冠颜色及周围种植体周软组织的影响:分光光度分析
J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Aug;16(4):231-243. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.4.231. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
4
Clinical Factors on Dental Implant Fractures: A Systematic Review.牙种植体骨折的临床因素:一项系统评价。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jun 28;12(7):200. doi: 10.3390/dj12070200.
5
Retention of zirconia crown to oxidized titanium base abutment: Experimental research.氧化钛基台的氧化锆冠固位:实验研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 25;18(10):e0287108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287108. eCollection 2023.
6
Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser as a Debridement Method in Surgical Treatment for Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review.铒激光作为种植体周围炎外科治疗中清创方法的疗效:一项系统评价。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2023 Jan 18;21:17-24. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b3818041.
7
What is the prevalence of peri-implantitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.种植体周围炎的流行率是多少?系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Oct 19;22(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02493-8.
8
Titanium Nanosurface with a Biomimetic Physical Microenvironment to Induce Endogenous Regeneration of the Periodontium.仿生物理微环境的钛纳米表面诱导牙周组织的内源性再生。
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022 Jun 22;14(24):27703-27719. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c06679. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
9
Clinical and radiographical performance of implants placed with simultaneous guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes after 22-24 years, a prospective, controlled clinical trial.22-24 年后,使用可吸收和不可吸收膜进行同期引导骨再生的种植体的临床和影像学表现:一项前瞻性、对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Dec;32(12):1455-1465. doi: 10.1111/clr.13845. Epub 2021 Oct 3.
10
Marginal Adaptation and Microbial Leakage at Conometric Prosthetic Connections for Implant-Supported Single Crowns: An In Vitro Investigation.冠向聚合修复体连接用于种植体支持的单冠修复的边缘适合性和微生物渗漏:一项体外研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jan 17;22(2):881. doi: 10.3390/ijms22020881.