Taggar Amandeep, MacKenzie Joanna, Li Haocheng, Lau Harold, Lim Gerald, Nordal Robert, Hudson Alana, Khan Rao, Spencer David, Voroney Jon-Paul
Oncology, University of Calgary.
NHS Lothian.
Cureus. 2016 May 17;8(5):e612. doi: 10.7759/cureus.612.
To audit outcomes after introducing frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases, including co-interventions: neurosurgery, systemic therapy, and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). We report median overall survival (MS), local failure, and distant brain failure. We hypothesized patients treated with SRS would have clinically meaningful improved MS compared with historic institutional values. We further hypothesized that patients treated with co-interventions would have clinically meaningful improved MS compared with patients treated with SRS alone.
One hundred twenty patients (N = 120) with limited intracranial disease underwent 130 frameless SRS sessions from April 2010 to May 2013. Median follow-up was 11 months. MS was measured from brain metastases diagnosis, local failure, and distant brain failure from the time of first SRS.
Practice pattern during the first year of the study favored upfront WBRT (79%) over SRS (21%) while upfront SRS (45%) was almost as common as upfront WBRT (55%) in the last year of the study. MS was 18 months; 37% received SRS alone as initial radiotherapy (MS 12 months); 63% received WBRT prior to SRS (MS 19 months); 50% received systemic therapy post-SRS (MS 21 months); and 26% had tumor resection then SRS to the surgical cavity (MS 42 months). Local failure occurred in 10% of lesions and radio-necrosis occurred in 4%. Differences in distant brain failure among patients treated with upfront SRS (40% rate), WBRT followed by SRS (33% rate) or systemic therapy post-SRS (37% rate) were not statistically significant.
Frameless SRS effectively treats surgical cavities, persistent tumors post-WBRT, and can be used as an upfront treatment of brain metastases. Surgery, systemic therapy, and WBRT are associated with longer MS. Patients can live for years while receiving multiple therapies. Systemic therapy for patients with brain metastases is increasingly common, palliative care occurs earlier and improves survival, and WBRT use is not routine. Modern series sometimes produce unexpectedly good results. Classification and treatment protocols are evolving. This practice audit is note-worthy for (i) high median overall survival, (ii) systemic therapy after radiosurgery for patients with tumors treated by radiosurgery, (iii) distant brain failure not significantly related to WBRT, and (iv) neurosurgery, systemic therapy, and WBRT are independently associated with improved MS.
审核引入无框架立体定向放射外科治疗(SRS)脑转移瘤后的治疗结果,包括联合干预措施:神经外科手术、全身治疗和全脑放疗(WBRT)。我们报告中位总生存期(MS)、局部失败率和远处脑转移失败率。我们假设与历史机构数据相比,接受SRS治疗的患者的MS会有具有临床意义的改善。我们进一步假设,与单纯接受SRS治疗的患者相比,接受联合干预措施治疗的患者的MS会有具有临床意义的改善。
2010年4月至2013年5月期间,120例颅内疾病有限的患者接受了130次无框架SRS治疗。中位随访时间为11个月。MS从脑转移瘤诊断时开始计算,局部失败率和远处脑转移失败率从首次SRS治疗时开始计算。
研究第一年的治疗模式倾向于先行WBRT(79%)而非SRS(21%),而在研究的最后一年,先行SRS(45%)几乎与先行WBRT(55%)一样常见。MS为18个月;37%的患者仅接受SRS作为初始放疗(MS为12个月);63%的患者在SRS之前接受了WBRT(MS为19个月);50%的患者在SRS后接受了全身治疗(MS为21个月);26%的患者先进行了肿瘤切除,然后对手术腔进行SRS治疗(MS为42个月)。10%的病灶出现局部失败,4%出现放射性坏死。先行SRS治疗的患者(远处脑转移失败率为40%)、先行WBRT然后行SRS治疗的患者(远处脑转移失败率为33%)或SRS后接受全身治疗的患者(远处脑转移失败率为37%)之间的远处脑转移失败率差异无统计学意义。
无框架SRS能有效治疗手术腔、WBRT后残留肿瘤,可作为脑转移瘤的一线治疗方法。手术、全身治疗和WBRT与更长的MS相关。患者在接受多种治疗的同时可以存活数年。脑转移瘤患者的全身治疗越来越普遍,姑息治疗更早进行且能提高生存率,WBRT并非常规使用。现代系列研究有时会产生意想不到的良好结果。分类和治疗方案正在不断发展。本实践审核值得关注的点在于:(i)中位总生存期高;(ii)接受放射外科治疗的肿瘤患者在放射外科手术后进行全身治疗;(iii)远处脑转移失败与WBRT无显著相关性;(iv)神经外科手术、全身治疗和WBRT均与MS改善独立相关。