Suppr超能文献

1 至 4 个脑转移瘤立体定向放射外科与或不伴全脑放疗的 3 期临床试验:个体患者数据荟萃分析。

Phase 3 trials of stereotactic radiosurgery with or without whole-brain radiation therapy for 1 to 4 brain metastases: individual patient data meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Radiology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Mar 15;91(4):710-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.024.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To perform an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for patients presenting with 1 to 4 brain metastases.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Three trials were identified through a literature search, and IPD were obtained. Outcomes of interest were survival, local failure, and distant brain failure. The treatment effect was estimated after adjustments for age, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) score, number of brain metastases, and treatment arm.

RESULTS

A total of 364 of the pooled 389 patients met eligibility criteria, of whom 51% were treated with SRS alone and 49% were treated with SRS plus WBRT. For survival, age was a significant effect modifier (P=.04) favoring SRS alone in patients ≤50 years of age, and no significant differences were observed in older patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) for patients 35, 40, 45, and 50 years of age were 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.90), 0.52 (95% CI = 0.29-0.92), 0.58 (95% CI = 0.35-0.95), and 0.64 (95% CI = 0.42-0.99), respectively. Patients with a single metastasis had significantly better survival than those who had 2 to 4 metastases. For distant brain failure, age was a significant effect modifier (P=.043), with similar rates in the 2 arms for patients ≤50 of age; otherwise, the risk was reduced with WBRT for patients >50 years of age. Patients with a single metastasis also had a significantly lower risk of distant brain failure than patients who had 2 to 4 metastases. Local control significantly favored additional WBRT in all age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients ≤50 years of age, SRS alone favored survival, in addition, the initial omission of WBRT did not impact distant brain relapse rates. SRS alone may be the preferred treatment for this age group.

摘要

目的

对评估立体定向放射外科(SRS)联合或不联合全脑放疗(WBRT)治疗 1-4 个脑转移瘤患者的随机对照试验进行个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析。

方法和材料

通过文献检索确定了三项试验,并获得了 IPD。感兴趣的结局是生存、局部失败和远处脑失败。在调整年龄、递归分区分析(RPA)评分、脑转移瘤数量和治疗臂后,估计治疗效果。

结果

总共 389 名符合纳入标准的患者中有 364 名,其中 51%接受 SRS 单独治疗,49%接受 SRS 联合 WBRT 治疗。对于生存,年龄是一个显著的效应修饰因子(P=.04),有利于≤50 岁的患者接受 SRS 单独治疗,而在年龄较大的患者中没有观察到显著差异。35、40、45 和 50 岁患者的危险比(HR)分别为 0.46(95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.24-0.90)、0.52(95% CI = 0.29-0.92)、0.58(95% CI = 0.35-0.95)和 0.64(95% CI = 0.42-0.99)。单个转移瘤患者的生存明显优于 2-4 个转移瘤患者。对于远处脑失败,年龄是一个显著的效应修饰因子(P=.043),≤50 岁的患者在两个治疗臂中的发生率相似;否则,年龄>50 岁的患者接受 WBRT 治疗,风险降低。单个转移瘤患者远处脑失败的风险也明显低于 2-4 个转移瘤患者。局部控制明显有利于所有年龄组的额外 WBRT。

结论

对于≤50 岁的患者,SRS 单独治疗有利于生存,此外,最初不使用 WBRT 不会影响远处脑复发率。SRS 单独治疗可能是该年龄组的首选治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验