文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Comprehensive genetic analysis of pregnancy loss by chromosomal microarrays: outcomes, benefits, and challenges.

作者信息

Sahoo Trilochan, Dzidic Natasa, Strecker Michelle N, Commander Sara, Travis Mary K, Doherty Charles, Tyson R Weslie, Mendoza Arturo E, Stephenson Mary, Dise Craig A, Benito Carlos W, Ziadie Mandolin S, Hovanes Karine

机构信息

CombiMatrix Diagnostics, Irvine, California, USA.

Department of Pathology, SCL Health System, Denver, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2017 Jan;19(1):83-89. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.69. Epub 2016 Jun 23.


DOI:10.1038/gim.2016.69
PMID:27337029
Abstract

PURPOSE: Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is currently considered first-tier testing in pediatric care and prenatal diagnosis owing to its high diagnostic sensitivity for chromosomal imbalances. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and diagnostic power of CMA in both fresh and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of products of conception (POCs). METHODS: Over a 44-month period, 8,118 consecutive samples were received by our laboratory for CMA analysis. This included both fresh (76.4%) and FFPE samples (22.4%), most of which were ascertained for recurrent pregnancy loss and/or spontaneous abortion (83%). The majority of samples were evaluated by a whole-genome single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based array (81.6%); the remaining samples were evaluated by array-comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). RESULTS: A successful result was obtained in 7,396 of 8,118 (91.1%), with 92.4% of fresh tissue samples and 86.4% of FFPE samples successfully analyzed. Clinically significant abnormalities were identified in 53.7% of specimens (3,975 of 7,396), 94% of which were considered causative. CONCLUSION: Analysis of POC specimens by karyotyping fails in 20-40% of cases. SNP-based CMA is a robust platform, with successful results obtained in >90% of cases. SNP-based CMA can identify aneuploidy, polyploidy, whole-genome homozygosity, segmental genomic imbalances, and maternal cell contamination, thus maximizing sensitivity and decreasing false-negative results. Understanding the etiology of fetal loss enables clarification of recurrence risk and assists in determining appropriate management for future family planning.Genet Med 19 1, 83-89.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Comprehensive genetic analysis of pregnancy loss by chromosomal microarrays: outcomes, benefits, and challenges.

Genet Med. 2017-1

[2]
Diagnostic utility of microarray testing in pregnancy loss.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015-10

[3]
Optimizing the Diagnostic Strategy to Identify Genetic Abnormalities in Miscarriage.

Mol Diagn Ther. 2021-5

[4]
[Application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization technique in genetic analysis of patients with spontaneous abortion].

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016-8-25

[5]
Development of a Chromosomal Microarray Test for the Detection of Abnormalities in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Products of Conception Specimens.

J Mol Diagn. 2017-8-12

[6]
Genomic imbalance in products of conception: single-nucleotide polymorphism chromosomal microarray analysis.

Obstet Gynecol. 2014-8

[7]
Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages.

Am J Hum Genet. 2004-6

[8]
Additional information from chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) over conventional karyotyping when diagnosing chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BJOG. 2013-7-17

[9]
Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions.

Am J Hum Genet. 2000-5

[10]
Detection of cytogenomic abnormalities by OncoScan microarray assay for products of conception from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded and fresh fetal tissues.

Mol Cytogenet. 2021-4-2

引用本文的文献

[1]
The Role of MLPA in Detecting Syndromic Submicroscopic Copy Number Variations in Normal QF-PCR Miscarriage Specimens.

Genes (Basel). 2025-7-24

[2]
Analysis of chromosomal aberrations in early pregnancy loss using high-throughput ligation-dependent probe amplification and single tandem repeats.

Mol Cytogenet. 2025-8-13

[3]
Chromosome Abnormality Detection Rates of QF-PCR in Early Pregnancy Loss.

Curr Health Sci J. 2025

[4]
Gene selection based on adaptive neighborhood-preserving multi-objective particle swarm optimization.

PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025-5-28

[5]
Fetal and parental genomes offer mechanistic insights into pregnancy loss.

Nature. 2025-6

[6]
Sequence diversity lost in early pregnancy.

Nature. 2025-5-21

[7]
Copy number variations in spontaneous abortions: a meta-analysis.

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025-4

[8]
Multi-omics PGT: re-evaluation of euploid blastocysts for implantation potential based on RNA sequencing.

Hum Reprod. 2024-12-1

[9]
Comparative Analysis of Two NGS-Based Platforms for Product-of-Conception Karyotyping.

Genes (Basel). 2024-8-21

[10]
Efficacy of non-invasive chromosome screening, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, and morphological grading in selecting embryos of patients with advanced maternal age: a three-armed prospective cohort study.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024-8-16

本文引用的文献

[1]
Chromosomal anomalies in early spontaneous abortions: interphase FISH analysis on 855 FFPE first trimester abortions.

Prenat Diagn. 2016-2

[2]
A national survey on public perceptions of miscarriage.

Obstet Gynecol. 2015-6

[3]
Genomic imbalance in products of conception: single-nucleotide polymorphism chromosomal microarray analysis.

Obstet Gynecol. 2014-8

[4]
Abnormalities in spontaneous abortions detected by G-banding and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) at a national reference laboratory.

Mol Cytogenet. 2014-5-22

[5]
Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue.

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014-3-3

[6]
Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.

Obstet Gynecol. 2013-12

[7]
Additional information from chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) over conventional karyotyping when diagnosing chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BJOG. 2013-7-17

[8]
Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth.

N Engl J Med. 2012-12-6

[9]
Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion.

Fertil Steril. 2012-7-24

[10]
Genetics of early miscarriage.

Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索