Kloft W J
Institut für Angewandte Zoologie der Universität, Bonn.
Naturwissenschaften. 1989 Apr;76(4):149-55. doi: 10.1007/BF00366394.
The question whether the possibility exists of transmission of HIV by hematophagous insects from infected to uninfected persons is a point of very intensive discussion. The solution of this problem could help to explain the spreading of the disease in human populations and could contribute to an understanding of the evolution of AIDS and the possible transfer from wild primates into human populations. The classical routes of pathogen transmission by blood-sucking arthropods are either "mechanical" or "biological". Both ways are rejected, the latter since no replication of the retro-virus in the vector exists and its survival in the arthropod is very limited. Based on long experimental experience with biting flies as well as with plant-sucking insects a third hitherto neglected way of transmission by regurgitation of gut content can be introduced. Since regurgitation is neither "mechanical" nor "biological", "regurgitative transmission" must be introduced as an additional term.
吸血昆虫是否存在将艾滋病毒从感染者传播给未感染者的可能性这一问题,是一个讨论非常激烈的焦点。解决这个问题有助于解释该疾病在人群中的传播情况,并有助于理解艾滋病的演变以及它可能从野生灵长类动物传播到人类群体的过程。吸血节肢动物传播病原体的经典途径要么是“机械性”的,要么是“生物性”的。这两种方式都被否定了,否定后者是因为逆转录病毒在载体中不存在复制现象,而且它在节肢动物体内的存活时间非常有限。基于对叮咬苍蝇以及吸食植物昆虫的长期实验经验,可以引入第三种迄今被忽视的通过反刍肠道内容物进行传播的方式。由于反刍既不是“机械性”的也不是“生物性”的,所以必须引入“反刍传播”这一额外术语。