Suppr超能文献

可治愈性切除的胸段食管鳞状细胞癌的最佳辅助治疗:放疗视角

Optimal Adjuvant Treatment for Curatively Resected Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Radiotherapy Perspective.

作者信息

Kim Kyung Hwan, Chang Jee Suk, Cha Ji Hye, Lee Ik Jae, Kim Dae Joon, Cho Byoung Chul, Park Kyung Ran, Lee Chang Geol

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jan;49(1):168-177. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.142. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefits of adjuvant treatment for curatively resected thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and determine the optimal adjuvant treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred ninety-five patients who underwent a curative resection for thoracic ESCC between 1994 and 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Postoperatively, the patients received no adjuvant treatment (no-adjuvant group, n=68), adjuvant chemotherapy (AC group, n=62), radiotherapy (RT group, n=41), or chemoradiotherapy (CRT group, n=24). Chemotherapy comprised cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil administration every 3 weeks. The median RT dose was 45.0 Gy (range, 34.8 to 59.4 Gy). The overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and distant metastasis (DM) rates were estimated.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up duration of 42.2 months (range, 6.3 to 215.2 months), the 5-year OS and DFS were 37.6% and 31.4%, respectively. After adjusting for other clinicopathologic variables, the AC and CRT groups had a significantly better OS and DFS compared to the no-adjuvant group (p < 0.05). The LRR rate was significantly lower in the RT and CRT groups than in the no-adjuvant group (p < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed in the AC group. In the no-adjuvant and AC groups, 25% of patients received high-dose salvage RT due to LRR. The DM rates were similar. The anastomotic stenosis and leakage were similar in the treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant treatment might prolong survival after an ESCC resection, and RT contributes to a reduction of the LRR. Overall, the risks and benefits should be weighed properly when selecting the optimal adjuvant treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估辅助治疗对接受根治性切除的胸段食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的益处,并确定最佳辅助治疗方案。

材料与方法

回顾性分析了1994年至2014年间195例接受胸段ESCC根治性切除的患者。术后,患者未接受辅助治疗(无辅助治疗组,n = 68)、辅助化疗(AC组,n = 62)、放疗(RT组,n = 41)或放化疗(CRT组,n = 24)。化疗方案为每3周给予顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶。放疗的中位剂量为45.0 Gy(范围34.8至59.4 Gy)。评估总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、局部区域复发(LRR)和远处转移(DM)率。

结果

中位随访时间为42.2个月(范围6.3至215.2个月),5年总生存率和无病生存率分别为37.6%和31.4%。在调整其他临床病理变量后,AC组和CRT组的总生存期和无病生存期显著优于无辅助治疗组(p < 0.05)。RT组和CRT组的局部区域复发率显著低于无辅助治疗组(p < 0.05),而AC组未观察到显著差异。在无辅助治疗组和AC组中,25%的患者因局部区域复发接受了高剂量挽救性放疗。远处转移率相似。各治疗组的吻合口狭窄和渗漏情况相似。

结论

辅助治疗可能延长ESCC切除术后的生存期,放疗有助于降低局部区域复发率。总体而言,在选择最佳辅助治疗时应权衡风险和益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62a0/5266406/c57189b9573c/crt-2016-142f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验