Brady Michael T
Michael T. Brady, M.D., is a Professor of Pediatrics at The Ohio State University. He is Associate Medical Director at Nationwide Children's Hospital. He was a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision.
J Law Med Ethics. 2016 Jun;44(2):256-62. doi: 10.1177/1073110516654119.
Newborn male circumcision is a minor surgical procedure that has generated significant controversy. Accumulating evidence supports significant health benefits, most notably reductions in urinary tract infections, acquisition of HIV and a number of other sexually transmitted infections, penile cancer, phimosis, paraphimosis, balanitis and lichen sclerosis. While circumcision, like any surgical procedure, has risks for complications, they occur in less than 1 in 500 infants circumcised and most are minor and require minimal intervention. The CDC and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) believe that health benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks. For this reason, the AAP believes that parents should be allowed to make the decision concerning circumcision of their male infants after receiving non-biased information on health risks and health benefits.
新生儿男性包皮环切术是一种小型外科手术,引发了重大争议。越来越多的证据支持其具有显著的健康益处,最明显的是可降低尿路感染、感染艾滋病毒及其他多种性传播感染、阴茎癌、包茎、包皮嵌顿、龟头炎和扁平苔藓的风险。虽然包皮环切术与任何外科手术一样有并发症风险,但在接受包皮环切术的婴儿中,并发症发生率不到五百分之一,且大多数并发症轻微,只需极少干预。美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)和美国儿科学会(AAP)认为,包皮环切术的健康益处大于风险。因此,美国儿科学会认为,在获得关于健康风险和健康益处的客观信息后,应允许父母做出为其男婴进行包皮环切术的决定。