Suppr超能文献

重新审视新生儿包皮环切术。加拿大儿科学会胎儿与新生儿委员会。

Neonatal circumcision revisited. Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society.

出版信息

CMAJ. 1996 Mar 15;154(6):769-80.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assist physicians in providing guidance to parents regarding neonatal circumcision.

OPTIONS

Whether to recommend the routine circumcision of newborn male infants.

OUTCOMES

Costs and complications of neonatal circumcision, the incidence of urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases and cancer of the penis in circumcised and uncircumcised males, and of cervical cancer in their partners, and the costs of treating these diseases.

EVIDENCE

The literature on circumcision was reviewed by the Fetus and Newborn Committee of the Canadian Paediatric Society. During extensive discussion at meetings of the committee over a 24-month period, the strength of the evidence was carefully weighed and the perspective of the committee developed.

VALUES

The literature was assessed to determine whether neonatal circumcision improves the health of boys and men and is a cost-effective approach to preventing penile problems and associated urinary tract conditions. Religious and personal values were not included in the assessment.

BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: The effect of neonatal circumcision on the incidence of urinary tract infection, sexually transmitted diseases, cancer of the penis, cervical cancer and penile problems; the complications of circumcision; and estimates of the costs of neonatal circumcision and of the treatment of later penile conditions, urinary tract infections and complications of circumcision.

RECOMMENDATION

Circumcision of newborns should not be routinely performed.

VALIDATION

This recommendation is in keeping with previous statements on neonatal circumcision by the Canadian Paediatric Society and the American Academy of Pediatrics. The statement was reviewed by the Infectious Disease Committee of the Canadian Paediatric Society. The Board of Directors of the Canadian Paediatric Society has reviewed its content and approved it for publication.

SPONSOR

This is an official statement of the Canadian Paediatric Society. No external financial support has been received by the Canadian Paediatric Society, or its members, for any portion of the statement's preparation.

摘要

目的

协助医生为家长提供有关新生儿包皮环切术的指导。

选项

是否推荐对新生男婴进行常规包皮环切术。

结果

新生儿包皮环切术的成本和并发症、包皮环切和未包皮环切男性的尿路感染、性传播疾病及阴茎癌发病率,以及其性伴侣的宫颈癌发病率,还有治疗这些疾病的成本。

证据

加拿大儿科学会胎儿与新生儿委员会对有关包皮环切术的文献进行了综述。在为期24个月的委员会会议期间进行广泛讨论时,仔细权衡了证据的力度并形成了委员会的观点。

价值观

对文献进行评估以确定新生儿包皮环切术是否能改善男孩和男性的健康状况,以及是否是预防阴茎问题和相关泌尿系统疾病的经济有效方法。评估中未纳入宗教和个人价值观。

益处、危害和成本:新生儿包皮环切术对尿路感染、性传播疾病、阴茎癌、宫颈癌及阴茎问题发病率的影响;包皮环切术的并发症;以及新生儿包皮环切术及后续阴茎疾病、尿路感染和包皮环切术并发症治疗成本的估计。

建议

不应常规对新生儿进行包皮环切术。

验证

该建议与加拿大儿科学会和美国儿科学会先前关于新生儿包皮环切术的声明一致。该声明经加拿大儿科学会传染病委员会审查。加拿大儿科学会董事会已审查其内容并批准发表。

赞助

这是加拿大儿科学会的官方声明。加拿大儿科学会及其成员在声明编写的任何部分均未获得外部资金支持。

相似文献

2
Male circumcision.男性割礼。
Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):e756-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1990. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
7
Neonatal circumcision.新生儿包皮环切术
Urol Clin North Am. 1995 Feb;22(1):57-65.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of circumcision in children with single ventricle physiology.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2018 Jul;34(7):803-806. doi: 10.1007/s00383-018-4284-7. Epub 2018 May 29.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验