Gruenbaum Shaun E, Zlotnik Alexander, Gruenbaum Benjamin F, Hersey Denise, Bilotta Federico
Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 84101, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
CNS Drugs. 2016 Sep;30(9):791-806. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0355-2.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. The deleterious effects of secondary brain injury may be attenuated by early pharmacological therapy in the emergency room and intensive care unit (ICU). Current medical management of acute TBI is primarily supportive, aimed at reducing intracranial pressure (ICP) and optimizing cerebral perfusion. There are no pharmacological therapies to date that have been unequivocally demonstrated to improve neurological outcomes after TBI.
The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the recent clinical studies from January 2013 through November 2015 that investigated neuroprotective functional outcomes of pharmacological agents after TBI.
The following databases were searched for relevant studies: MEDLINE (OvidSP January Week 1, 2013-November Week 2 2015), Embase (OvidSP 2013 January 1-2015 November 24), and the unindexed material in PubMed (National Library of Medicine/National Institutes of Health [NLM/NIH]). This systematic review included only full-length clinical studies and case series that included at least five patients and were published in the English language. Only studies that examined functional clinical outcomes were included.
Twenty-five of 527 studies met our inclusion criteria, which investigated 15 independent pharmacological therapies. Eight of these therapies demonstrated possible neuroprotective properties and improved functional outcomes, of which five were investigated with randomized clinical trials: statins, N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), Enzogenol, Cerebrolysin, and nitric oxide synthase inhibitor (VAS203). Three pharmacological agents did not demonstrate neuroprotective effects, and four agents had mixed results.
While there is currently no single pharmacological therapy that will unequivocally improve clinical outcomes after TBI, several agents have demonstrated promising clinical benefits for specific TBI patients and should be investigated further.
创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是全球范围内死亡和残疾的主要原因。继发性脑损伤的有害影响可通过在急诊室和重症监护病房(ICU)进行早期药物治疗来减轻。目前急性TBI的药物治疗主要是支持性的,旨在降低颅内压(ICP)并优化脑灌注。迄今为止,尚无明确证明能改善TBI后神经功能结局的药物治疗方法。
本系统评价的目的是评估2013年1月至2015年11月期间调查TBI后药物神经保护功能结局的近期临床研究。
检索以下数据库以查找相关研究:MEDLINE(OvidSP 2013年第1周 - 2015年第2周)、Embase(OvidSP 2013年1月1日 - 2015年11月24日)以及PubMed中的未索引资料(美国国立医学图书馆/美国国立卫生研究院 [NLM/NIH])。本系统评价仅纳入至少有五名患者且以英文发表的完整临床研究和病例系列。仅纳入检查功能临床结局的研究。
527项研究中有25项符合我们的纳入标准,这些研究调查了15种独立的药物治疗方法。其中8种治疗方法显示出可能的神经保护特性并改善了功能结局,其中5种通过随机临床试验进行了研究:他汀类药物、N - 乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)、Enzogenol、脑蛋白水解物和一氧化氮合酶抑制剂(VAS203)。三种药物未显示神经保护作用,四种药物结果不一。
虽然目前尚无单一药物治疗能明确改善TBI后的临床结局,但几种药物已显示对特定TBI患者有潜在的临床益处,应进一步研究。