• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后心电图可预测术后高度房室传导阻滞风险及是否需要遥测监护。

The Electrocardiogram After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Determines the Risk for Post-Procedural High-Degree AV Block and the Need for Telemetry Monitoring.

机构信息

Heart Center, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Swiss Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Berne, Berne, Switzerland.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun 27;9(12):1269-1276. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.024. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.024
PMID:27339844
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study sought to identify predictors for delayed high-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and determine the need and required duration of telemetry monitoring.

BACKGROUND

Little is known about predictors and timing of high-degree AVB.

METHODS

A total of 1,064 patients (52% women) without a permanent pacemaker undergoing TAVR at 3 centers in Switzerland were investigated. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) at baseline and post-TAVR were analyzed to identify atrioventricular and interventricular conduction disorders.

RESULTS

Periprocedural high-degree AVB occurred in 92 (8.7%), delayed high-degree AVB in 71 (6.7%), up to 8 days post-procedure. In multivariate analysis, delayed high-degree AVB occurred more frequently in men (odds ratio: 2.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 4.5; p < 0.01), and in patients with conduction disorders post-TAVR (odds ratio: 10.8; 95% confidence interval: 4.6 to 25.5; p < 0.01). Patients in sinus rhythm without conduction disorders post-TAVR did not develop delayed high-degree AVB (0 of 250, 0%). Similarly, the risk in patients with atrial fibrillation but no other conduction disorders was very low (1 of 102, 1%). There was no patient developing delayed high-degree AVB who had a stable ECG for 2 days or more.

CONCLUSION

Patients without conduction disorders post-TAVR did not develop delayed high-degree AVB. Such patients may not require telemetry monitoring. All other patients should be monitored until the ECG remains stable for at least 2 days. This algorithm should be validated in a separate patient population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的患者发生延迟性高度房室传导阻滞(AVB)的预测因素,并确定遥测监测的必要性和所需时间。

背景

关于高度 AVB 的预测因素和发生时间知之甚少。

方法

本研究共纳入了在瑞士 3 家中心接受 TAVR 的 1064 名(52%为女性)无永久性起搏器的患者。分析术前和术后的心电图(ECG),以确定房室和室间传导障碍。

结果

92 名(8.7%)患者发生了围手术期高度 AVB,71 名(6.7%)患者发生了延迟性高度 AVB,发生时间在术后 8 天内。多变量分析显示,男性(比值比:2.4,95%置信区间:1.3 至 4.5;p<0.01)和术后存在传导障碍的患者更易发生延迟性高度 AVB,比值比分别为 10.8 和 4.6 至 25.5(p<0.01)。术后无传导障碍且节律为窦性的患者未发生延迟性高度 AVB(250 例中无 1 例,0%)。同样,无其他传导障碍且房颤的患者风险也非常低(102 例中 1 例,1%)。无 1 例延迟性高度 AVB 患者的心电图稳定 2 天或以上。

结论

术后无传导障碍的患者不会发生延迟性高度 AVB。此类患者可能无需进行遥测监测。所有其他患者应在心电图稳定至少 2 天之前进行监测。该算法应在另一组患者中进行验证。

相似文献

1
The Electrocardiogram After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Determines the Risk for Post-Procedural High-Degree AV Block and the Need for Telemetry Monitoring.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后心电图可预测术后高度房室传导阻滞风险及是否需要遥测监护。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun 27;9(12):1269-1276. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.024. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
2
Ambulatory Rhythm Monitoring to Detect Late High-Grade Atrioventricular Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后动态心电图监测晚期高度房室传导阻滞。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 28;73(20):2538-2547. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.068.
3
Utility of 30-Day Continuous Ambulatory Monitoring to Identify Patients With Delayed Occurrence of Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 30 天连续动态监测对诊断房室传导阻滞迟发的作用。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec;12(12):e007635. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007635. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
4
Predictors for new-onset conduction block in patients with pure native aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a new-generation self-expanding valve (VitaFlow Liberty): a retrospective cohort study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发传导阻滞的预测因素:新一代自膨式瓣膜(VitaFlow Liberty)治疗单纯原发性主动脉瓣反流的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jan 28;24(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03735-z.
5
Conduction Abnormalities and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Repositionable LOTUS Device: The United Kingdom Experience.经导管主动脉瓣置换术使用可重定位 LOTUS 装置后的传导异常和永久性起搏器植入:英国经验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1247-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.044.
6
Long-term percentage of ventricular pacing in patients requiring pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A multicenter 10-year experience.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后需要植入起搏器的患者中,长期心室起搏的比例:一项多中心 10 年经验。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Nov;17(11):1897-1903. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.05.040. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
7
The Utility of Rapid Atrial Pacing Immediately Post-TAVR to Predict the Need for Pacemaker Implantation.经 TAVR 术后即刻行快速心房起搏在预测起搏器植入需求中的作用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 11;13(9):1046-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.215. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
8
Delayed Total Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Assessed by Implantable Loop Recorders.经植入式环路记录器评估的经导管主动脉瓣置换术后延迟性完全性房室传导阻滞。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Dec 27;14(24):2723-2732. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.003.
9
Recovery of atrioventricular conduction in patients with heart block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后心脏传导阻滞患者房室传导的恢复情况
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Oct;28(10):1196-1202. doi: 10.1111/jce.13291. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
10
Respective role of surface electrocardiogram and His bundle recordings to assess the risk of atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.体表心电图和希氏束记录在评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术后房室传导阻滞风险中的各自作用。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 1;236:216-220. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of conduction disturbances after TAVI: the last step towards early discharge.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后传导障碍的管理:迈向早期出院的最后一步。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2025 May 28;22(5):534-546. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2025.05.004.
2
A proposed algorithm for management of patients with left bundle branch block post-TAVR: 1-year follow-up.一种用于经导管主动脉瓣置换术后左束支传导阻滞患者管理的拟议算法:1年随访
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Sep 27;5(12):873-882. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.015. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Readmissions after next-day discharge following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术后次日出院后的再入院情况。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Dec 16;20(24):e1505-e1519. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00514.
4
Saudi Heart Association/National Heart Center/Saudi Arabian Cardiac Interventional Society/Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons/Saudi Cardiac Imaging Group 2023 TAVI Guidelines.沙特心脏协会/国家心脏中心/沙特阿拉伯心脏介入学会/沙特心脏外科医生协会/沙特心脏影像小组2023年经导管主动脉瓣置入术指南
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 15;36(2):184-231. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1379. eCollection 2024.
5
Pacemaker post transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A multifactorial risk?经导管主动脉瓣置换术后起搏器植入:一种多因素风险?
World J Cardiol. 2024 Apr 26;16(4):168-172. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i4.168.
6
Predictors, clinical impact, and management strategies for conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an updated review.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导异常的预测因素、临床影响及管理策略:最新综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 8;11:1370244. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1370244. eCollection 2024.
7
Impact of New-Onset Right Bundle-Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Permanent Pacemaker Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发右束支传导阻滞对永久性起搏器植入的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 7;13(9):e032777. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032777. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
8
A Systematic Review of Delayed High-Grade Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后迟发性高度房室传导阻滞的系统评价
CJC Open. 2023 Oct 9;6(2Part A):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.10.003. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Incidence and Outcomes of New-Onset Right Bundle Branch Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发右束支传导阻滞的发生率和转归。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 Feb;17(2):e012377. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012377. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
10
Rationale and Design of the Randomized Bayesian Multicenter COME-TAVI Trial in Patients With a New Onset Left Bundle Branch Block.新发左束支传导阻滞患者随机贝叶斯多中心COME-TAVI试验的原理与设计
CJC Open. 2023 Jul 13;5(8):611-618. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.05.009. eCollection 2023 Aug.