Renda Levent, Selçuk Ömer Tarık, Eyigör Hülya, Osma Üstün, Yılmaz Mustafa Deniz
Department of Ear Nose and Throat, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
J Int Adv Otol. 2016 Apr;12(1):61-6. doi: 10.5152/iao.2016.1421.
To determine the hearing levels of participants of a randomized group using a smartphone hearing application and to compare these results with the results from a pure-tone audiogram.
A heterogenous group consisting of both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired participants were included in this study. Pure-tone audiogram thresholds were measured from 250 Hz to 8000 Hz, while smartphone measurements were obtained with a Samsung Galaxy GT-19500 S4 with a bundled headphone running the Hearing Test™ software (e-audiologia.pl), which was downloaded from the Google Play Store as a free application. We compared these results with those obtained from pure-tone audiograms performed by an audiologist as a reference.
Validity analysis indicated that the results for each ear and each frequency were excellent (>0.75). We assessed the mean difference between the pure-tone audiogram and the smartphone hearing test results and found the absolute difference to be less than 8.8 dB.
Smartphone hearing test applications are providing alternative tests that present low-cost solutions. Using the hearing application test may decrease the demand for audiological services in underserved areas. The study suggests that smartphone hearing test results are comparable to pure-tone audiometry results.
使用智能手机听力应用程序确定随机分组参与者的听力水平,并将这些结果与纯音听力图的结果进行比较。
本研究纳入了由听力正常和听力受损参与者组成的异质群体。测量了从250赫兹到8000赫兹的纯音听力图阈值,而智能手机测量则使用搭载了运行“听力测试”(Hearing Test™)软件(e-audiologia.pl)的捆绑式耳机的三星Galaxy GT-19500 S4手机进行,该软件是从谷歌应用商店免费下载的。我们将这些结果与听力学家进行的纯音听力图结果作为参考进行比较。
效度分析表明,每只耳朵和每个频率的结果都非常好(>0.75)。我们评估了纯音听力图与智能手机听力测试结果之间的平均差异,发现绝对差异小于8.8分贝。
智能手机听力测试应用程序正在提供低成本解决方案的替代测试。使用听力应用程序测试可能会减少服务不足地区对听力服务的需求。该研究表明,智能手机听力测试结果与纯音听力测定结果具有可比性。