Kelly Niall, Garvey John, Palcic Dónal
Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Health Policy. 2016 Aug;120(8):913-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
In 2001 the Irish government published a reforming policy intended to modernise and expand the delivery of primary care in Ireland. Fifteen years later, the Irish health system remains beset by problems indicative of a fragmented and underdeveloped primary care system. This case study examines the formation and implementation of the 2001 primary care policy and identifies key risk categories within the policymaking process itself that inhibited the timely achievement of policy objectives. Our methodology includes a directed content analysis of the policy formation and implementation documents and the influencing academic literature, as well as semi-structured interviews with key personnel involved in the process. We identify three broad risk categories - power, resources and capability - within the policymaking process that strongly influenced policy formation and implementation. We additionally show that the disjoint between policy formation and policy implementation was a contested issue among those involved in the policy process and provided space for these risks to critically undermine Ireland's primary care policy.
2001年,爱尔兰政府发布了一项改革政策,旨在使爱尔兰的初级医疗服务实现现代化并加以扩展。十五年后,爱尔兰医疗系统仍饱受问题困扰,这些问题表明其初级医疗体系分散且发展不足。本案例研究考察了2001年初级医疗政策的形成与实施情况,并确定了政策制定过程中阻碍政策目标及时实现的关键风险类别。我们的方法包括对政策形成和实施文件以及相关学术文献进行定向内容分析,以及对参与该过程的关键人员进行半结构化访谈。我们确定了政策制定过程中的三大风险类别——权力、资源和能力——它们对政策的形成和实施产生了重大影响。我们还表明,政策形成与政策实施之间的脱节是政策过程相关人员之间存在争议的问题,并且为这些风险严重破坏爱尔兰的初级医疗政策提供了空间。