Suppr超能文献

房颤患者使用Watchman左心耳封堵装置与长期华法林治疗的前瞻性随机评估:PREVAIL试验。

Prospective randomized evaluation of the watchman left atrial appendage closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: The PREVAIL trial.

作者信息

Belgaid Djouhar Roufeida, Khan Zara, Zaidi Mariam, Hobbs Adrian

机构信息

Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.

Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 15;219:177-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.041. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Assessing the safety and effectiveness of left atrial appendage (LAA) (pouch found in the upper chambers of the heart) occlusion, using the Watchman device compared to long term warfarin therapy (drug that reduces clot formation), in preventing the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (most common type of irregular heart beat). 90% of strokes in atrial fibrillation arise from clots forming in this pouch. By mechanically blocking it using the device less clots are suggested to be formed. This is an alternative to taking warfarin especially in patients who cannot take it.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

50 sites in the United States enrolled 407 participants. After being randomly allocated, the device group had 269 participants and warfarin group (comparator)had 138 participants.

METHOD

Patients with atrial fibrillation and at high risk of stroke were randomly allocated a group after they were deemed eligible. Patients in the device group had to take warfarin and aspirin for 45days till the complete closure of the LAA. The oral anticoagulant was followed by dual antiplatelet therapy until 6months and then ASA. Patients in the warfarin group have to take it for life and were continually monitored. The study ran for 26months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The trial assessed the rate of adverse events using three endpoints:

RESULTS

The PREVAIL trial was not designed to show superiority, but non-inferiority. It met the safety endpoint and one efficacy endpoint for the watchman device compared to long term warfarin for overall efficacy of the device. The results established that LAA occlusion is not worse than warfarin intake for the prevention of stroke more than 1week after randomization. Compared to previous trials, the safety of the device has also improved.

CONCLUSION

LAA occlusion is a reasonable alternative to chronic warfarin therapy in stroke prevention for patients with atrial fibrillation.

摘要

目的

评估与长期华法林治疗(一种减少血栓形成的药物)相比,使用Watchman装置封堵左心耳(心脏上腔中发现的袋状结构)在预防房颤(最常见的心律失常类型)患者中风风险方面的安全性和有效性。房颤患者中90%的中风源于该袋状结构中形成的血栓。通过使用该装置机械性地封堵它,预计可减少血栓形成。这是服用华法林的一种替代方法,尤其适用于不能服用华法林的患者。

设置与参与者

美国的50个地点招募了407名参与者。随机分配后,装置组有269名参与者,华法林组(对照组)有138名参与者。

方法

房颤且中风高危患者在被判定符合条件后被随机分配到一组。装置组的患者必须服用华法林和阿司匹林45天,直到左心耳完全闭合。口服抗凝药后进行双联抗血小板治疗直至6个月,然后服用阿司匹林。华法林组的患者必须终身服用,并持续监测。该研究持续了26个月。

主要结局指标

该试验使用三个终点评估不良事件发生率:

结果

PREVAIL试验并非旨在显示优越性,而是非劣效性。与长期华法林相比,就该装置的总体疗效而言,它达到了Watchman装置的安全性终点和一个疗效终点。结果表明,在随机分组后1周以上预防中风方面,左心耳封堵并不比服用华法林差。与之前的试验相比,该装置的安全性也有所提高。

结论

对于房颤患者预防中风,左心耳封堵是慢性华法林治疗的合理替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验