Wallace Sarah J, Worrall Linda, Rose Tanya, Le Dorze Guylaine, Cruice Madeline, Isaksen Jytte, Kong Anthony Pak Hin, Simmons-Mackie Nina, Scarinci Nerina, Gauvreau Christine Alary
a School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland , Brisbane , Australia.
b Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Montreal, School of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Montreal , Montreal , Canada.
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jul;39(14):1364-1379. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1194899. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
To identify important treatment outcomes from the perspective of people with aphasia and their families using the ICF as a frame of reference.
The nominal group technique was used with people with aphasia and their family members in seven countries to identify and rank important treatment outcomes from aphasia rehabilitation. People with aphasia identified outcomes for themselves; and family members identified outcomes for themselves and for the person with aphasia. Outcomes were analysed using qualitative content analysis and ICF linking.
A total of 39 people with aphasia and 29 family members participated in one of 16 nominal groups. Inductive qualitative content analysis revealed the following six themes: (1) Improved communication; (2) Increased life participation; (3) Changed attitudes through increased awareness and education about aphasia; (4) Recovered normality; (5) Improved physical and emotional well-being; and (6) Improved health (and support) services. Prioritized outcomes for both participant groups linked to all ICF components; primary activity/participation (39%) and body functions (36%) for people with aphasia, and activity/participation (49%) and environmental factors (28%) for family members. Outcomes prioritized by family members relating to the person with aphasia, primarily linked to body functions (60%).
People with aphasia and their families identified treatment outcomes which span all components of the ICF. This has implications for research outcome measurement and clinical service provision which currently focuses on the measurement of body function outcomes. The wide range of desired outcomes generated by both people with aphasia and their family members, highlights the importance of collaborative goal setting within a family-centred approach to rehabilitation. These results will be combined with other stakeholder perspectives to establish a core outcome set for aphasia treatment research. Implications for Rehabilitation Important outcomes for people with aphasia and their families span all components of the ICF. The relevancy and translation of research findings may be increased by measuring and reporting research outcomes which are important to people living with aphasia. The results of this study indicate that important treatment outcomes for people living with aphasia most frequently link to the activity/participation and body function components of the ICF. The outcomes identified in this study suggest a broad role for clinicians working in aphasia rehabilitation. The categories of identified outcomes may be used clinically as a starting point in goal-setting discussions with clients and their families.
以《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)作为参照框架,从失语症患者及其家属的角度确定重要的治疗结果。
在七个国家对失语症患者及其家属采用名义小组技术,以确定失语症康复的重要治疗结果并进行排序。失语症患者确定自身的结果;家属确定自身以及失语症患者的结果。采用定性内容分析法和ICF关联法对结果进行分析。
共有39名失语症患者和29名家属参与了16个名义小组中的一个。归纳定性内容分析揭示了以下六个主题:(1)沟通改善;(2)生活参与度提高;(3)通过提高对失语症的认识和教育改变态度;(4)恢复正常;(5)身体和情绪健康改善;(6)健康(及支持)服务改善。两个参与组的优先结果均与所有ICF组成部分相关联;失语症患者的主要活动/参与(39%)和身体功能(36%),家属的活动/参与(49%)和环境因素(28%)。家属确定的与失语症患者相关的优先结果主要与身体功能(60%)相关联。
失语症患者及其家属确定的治疗结果涵盖了ICF的所有组成部分。这对目前侧重于身体功能结果测量的研究结果测量和临床服务提供具有启示意义。失语症患者及其家属产生的广泛期望结果凸显了在以家庭为中心的康复方法中协作设定目标的重要性。这些结果将与其他利益相关者的观点相结合,以建立失语症治疗研究的核心结果集。对康复的启示 失语症患者及其家属的重要结果涵盖了ICF的所有组成部分。通过测量和报告对失语症患者重要的研究结果,可能会提高研究结果的相关性和可转化性。本研究结果表明,失语症患者重要的治疗结果最常与ICF的活动/参与和身体功能组成部分相关联。本研究确定的结果表明失语症康复临床医生的作用广泛。确定的结果类别可在临床上用作与患者及其家属进行目标设定讨论的起点。