Redfern James, Illingworth Sam, Verran Joanna
School of Healthcare Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
School of Research, Enterprise & Innovation, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
F1000Res. 2016 Jun 7;5:1261. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8815.1. eCollection 2016.
The overall aim of public academic science communication is to engage a non-scientist with a particular field of science and/or research topic, often driven by the expertise of the academic. An e-survey was designed to provide insight into respondent's current and future engagement with science communication activities. Respondents provided a wide range of ideas and concerns as to the 'common practice' of academic science communication, and whilst they support some of these popular approaches (such as open-door events and science festivals), there are alternatives that may enable wider engagement. Suggestions of internet-based approaches and digital media were strongly encouraged, and although respondents found merits in methods such as science festivals, limitations such as geography, time and topic of interest were a barrier to engagement for some. Academics and scientists need to think carefully about how they plan their science communication activities and carry out evaluations, including considering the point of view of the public, as although defaulting to hands-on open door events at their university may seem like the expected standard, it may not be the best way to reach the intended audience.
公共学术科学传播的总体目标是让非科学家参与到特定的科学领域和/或研究课题中,这通常由学术专家推动。一项电子调查旨在深入了解受访者当前和未来对科学传播活动的参与情况。受访者就学术科学传播的“常见做法”提出了广泛的想法和担忧,虽然他们支持其中一些流行的方式(如开放日活动和科学节),但也有其他方式可能会带来更广泛的参与度。基于互联网的方法和数字媒体的建议得到了大力鼓励,尽管受访者发现科学节等方式有其优点,但地理、时间和兴趣主题等限制对一些人来说是参与的障碍。学者和科学家需要仔细思考他们如何规划科学传播活动并进行评估,包括考虑公众的观点,因为尽管在大学默认举办亲身体验的开放日活动可能看起来是预期的标准,但这可能不是接触目标受众的最佳方式。