Kaiser Margarita, Eberl Robert, Castellani Christoph, Kraus Tanja, Till Holger, Singer Georg
a Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Surgery , Medical University of Graz , Graz , Austria.
Acta Orthop. 2016 Oct;87(5):529-32. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1203700. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
Background and purpose - Heavily displaced radial neck fractures in children are sometimes associated with poor outcome. A substantial number of these fractures require open reduction. We hypothesized that Judet type-IV fractures with a completely displaced radial head would result in a worse outcome than radial neck fractures with remaining bony contact. Patients and methods - We analyzed 19 children (median age 9.7 (4-13) years) who were treated for Judet type-IV radial neck fractures between 2001 and 2014. The outcome was assessed at the latest outpatient visit using the Linscheid-Wheeler score at a median time of 3.5 (1-8) years after injury. The patients were assigned either to group A (9 fractures with remaining bony contact between the radial head and the radial neck) or to group B (10 fractures without any bony contact). Results - The 2 groups were similar concerning age and sex. The rate of additional injuries was higher in group B (7/10 vs. 1/9 in group A; p = 0.009). The rate of open reduction was higher in group B (5/10 vs. 0/9 in group A; p = 0.01). Poor outcome was more common in group B (4/10 vs. 0/9 in group A; p = 0.03). In group B, the proportion of children with poor outcome (almost half) was the same irrespective of whether open or closed reduction had been done. Interpretation - The main causes of unfavorable results of radial neck fracture in children appear to be related to the energy of the injury and the amount of displacement-and not to whether open reduction was used.
背景与目的——儿童严重移位的桡骨颈骨折有时预后较差。这些骨折中有相当一部分需要切开复位。我们假设,桡骨头完全移位的Judet IV型骨折比仍有骨接触的桡骨颈骨折预后更差。
患者与方法——我们分析了2001年至2014年间接受Judet IV型桡骨颈骨折治疗的19名儿童(中位年龄9.7(4 - 13)岁)。在受伤后中位时间3.5(1 - 8)年的最近一次门诊就诊时,使用Linscheid - Wheeler评分评估预后。患者被分为A组(9例骨折,桡骨头与桡骨颈之间仍有骨接触)或B组(10例骨折,无任何骨接触)。
结果——两组在年龄和性别方面相似。B组的附加损伤发生率更高(7/10对比A组的1/9;p = 0.009)。B组的切开复位率更高(5/10对比A组的0/9;p = 0.01)。B组预后较差的情况更常见(4/10对比A组的0/9;p = 0.03)。在B组中,无论采用切开复位还是闭合复位,预后较差的儿童比例(几乎一半)相同。
解读——儿童桡骨颈骨折预后不良的主要原因似乎与损伤能量和移位程度有关,而与是否采用切开复位无关。