Pérez-Pérez María-Jesús, Priego Eva-María, Bueno Oskía, Martins Maria Solange, Canela María-Dolores, Liekens Sandra
Instituto de Química Médica (IQM-CSIC) , Juan de la Cierva 3, E-28006 Madrid, Spain.
Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven , B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
J Med Chem. 2016 Oct 13;59(19):8685-8711. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00463. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
The unique characteristics of the tumor vasculature offer the possibility to selectively target tumor growth and vascularization using tubulin-destabilizing agents. Evidence accumulated with combretastatin A-4 (CA-4) and its prodrug CA-4P support the therapeutic value of compounds sharing this mechanism of action. However, the chemical instability and poor solubility of CA-4 demand alternative compounds that are able to surmount these limitations. This Perspective illustrates the different classes of compounds that behave similar to CA-4, analyzes their binding mode to αβ-tubulin according to recently available structural complexes, and includes described approaches to improve their delivery. In addition, dissecting the mechanism of action of CA-4 and analogues allows a closer insight into the advantages and drawbacks associated with these tubulin-destabilizing agents that behave as vascular disrupting agents (VDAs).
肿瘤血管系统的独特特征为使用微管蛋白不稳定剂选择性靶向肿瘤生长和血管生成提供了可能性。与康普瑞汀A - 4(CA - 4)及其前药CA - 4P相关的证据支持了具有这种作用机制的化合物的治疗价值。然而,CA - 4的化学不稳定性和低溶解度需要能够克服这些限制的替代化合物。本综述阐述了与CA - 4表现相似的不同类别化合物,根据最近可得的结构复合物分析了它们与αβ - 微管蛋白的结合模式,并介绍了改善其递送的方法。此外,剖析CA - 4及其类似物的作用机制有助于更深入了解这些作为血管破坏剂(VDA)的微管蛋白不稳定剂的优缺点。