• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2001年至2012年美国经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的住院费用评估

Inpatient Cost Assessment of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in the USA from 2001 to 2012.

作者信息

Kuei Andrew, Lee Edward Wolfgang, Saab Sammy, Busuttil Ronald W, Durazo Francisco, Han Steven-Huy, ElKabany Mohamed, McWilliams Justin P, Kee Stephen T

机构信息

Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Ronald Reagan Medical Center at UCLA, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 757 Westwood Plaza, Suite 2125, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-743730, USA.

Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Pfleger Liver Institute, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Oct;61(10):2838-2846. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4233-z. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-016-4233-z
PMID:27349987
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite widespread use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for treatment of portal hypertension, a paucity of nationwide data exists on predictors of the economic impact related to TIPS.

AIMS

Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2001 to 2012, we aimed to evaluate factors contributing to hospital cost of patients admitted to US hospitals for TIPS.

METHODS

Using the NIS, we identified a discharge-weighted national estimate of 61,004 TIPS procedures from 2001 to 2012. Through independent sample analysis, we determined profile factors related to increases in hospital costs.

RESULTS

Of all TIPS cases, the mean charge adjusted for inflation to the year 2012 is $125,044 ± $160,115. The mean hospital cost adjusted for inflation is $44,901 ± $54,565. Comparing pre- and post-2005, mean charges and cost have increased considerably ($98,154 vs. $142,652, p < 0.001 and $41,656 vs. $46,453, p < 0.001, respectively). Patients transferred from a different hospital, weekend admissions, Asian/Pacific Islander patients, and hospitals in the Northeastern and Western region had higher cost. Number of diagnoses and number of procedures show positive correlations with hospital cost, with number of procedures exhibiting stronger relationships (Pearson 0.613). Comorbidity measures with highest increases in cost were pulmonary circulation disorders ($32,157 increase, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The cost of the TIPS procedure is gradually rising for hospitals. Alongside recent healthcare reform through the Affordable Care Act, measures to reduce the economic burden of TIPS are of increasing importance. Data from this study are intended to aid physicians and hospitals in identifying improvements that could reduce hospital costs.

摘要

背景

尽管经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)广泛用于治疗门静脉高压症,但关于TIPS相关经济影响预测因素的全国性数据却很匮乏。

目的

利用2001年至2012年的全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库,我们旨在评估导致美国医院因TIPS入院患者住院费用的因素。

方法

利用NIS,我们确定了2001年至2012年61,004例TIPS手术的出院加权全国估计数。通过独立样本分析,我们确定了与住院费用增加相关的特征因素。

结果

在所有TIPS病例中,经通胀调整至2012年的平均费用为125,044美元±160,115美元。经通胀调整的平均住院费用为44,901美元±54,565美元。比较2005年前后,平均费用和成本大幅增加(分别为98,154美元对142,652美元,p<0.001;41,656美元对46,453美元,p<0.001)。从不同医院转来的患者、周末入院患者、亚太岛民患者以及东北部和西部地区的医院费用更高。诊断数量和手术数量与住院费用呈正相关,手术数量的相关性更强(Pearson相关系数为0.613)。成本增加最高的合并症是肺循环障碍(增加32,157美元,p<0.001)。

结论

TIPS手术对医院来说成本在逐渐上升。随着近期通过《平价医疗法案》进行的医疗改革,减轻TIPS经济负担的措施变得越来越重要。本研究的数据旨在帮助医生和医院确定可降低住院成本的改进措施。

相似文献

1
Inpatient Cost Assessment of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in the USA from 2001 to 2012.2001年至2012年美国经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的住院费用评估
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Oct;61(10):2838-2846. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4233-z. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
2
Nationwide trends and predictors of inpatient mortality in 83884 transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.83884例经颈静脉肝内门体分流术患者住院死亡率的全国趋势及预测因素
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 7;22(25):5780-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i25.5780.
3
National Trends and Outcomes of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.利用全国住院患者样本分析经颈静脉肝内门体分流术创建的全国趋势和结果
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Jun;27(6):838-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.12.013. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
4
The smoker's paradox in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure: A national inpatient sample analysis from 2015 to 2020.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗中的吸烟者悖论:2015 年至 2020 年全国住院患者样本分析。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2024 May;48(5):102323. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102323. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
5
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus open splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization for portal hypertension with recurrent variceal bleeding.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术与开腹脾切除术及食管胃去血管化术治疗门静脉高压伴复发性静脉曲张出血的比较
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2017 Apr;16(2):169-175. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(16)60129-7.
6
Portosystemic Shunts: Stable Utilization and Improved Outcomes, Two Decades After the Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt.门体分流术:经颈静脉肝内门体分流术后二十年,稳定应用与改善的结局
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Dec;12(12 Pt B):1427-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.06.037. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
7
Rate, reasons, predictors, and burden of readmissions after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后再入院率、再入院原因、预测因素和负担。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Mar;36(3):775-781. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15194. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
8
Disparity Among African Americans in Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Procedure: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis from 2015 to 2020.非裔美国人经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的差异:2015年至2020年全国住院患者样本分析
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Mar;69(3):713-719. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08273-4. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
9
Clinical outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal hypertension: Korean multicenter real-practice data.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗门静脉高压症的临床疗效:韩国多中心真实实践数据。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;20(1):18-27. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2014.20.1.18. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
10
Decision-analysis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus distal splenorenal shunt for portal hypertension.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术与远端脾肾分流术治疗门静脉高压的决策分析
Hepatology. 1999 May;29(5):1399-405. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290512.

引用本文的文献

1
Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Outcomes in the Elderly Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.老年人群经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Gastroenterology Res. 2022 Dec;15(6):325-333. doi: 10.14740/gr1571. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
2
Rate, reasons, predictors, and burden of readmissions after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后再入院率、再入院原因、预测因素和负担。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Mar;36(3):775-781. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15194. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
3
Hospital readmission following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a 14-year single-center experience.

本文引用的文献

1
The Evolution of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: Tips.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的发展:技巧
ISRN Hepatol. 2014 Mar 18;2014:762096. doi: 10.1155/2014/762096. eCollection 2014.
2
The Epidemiology of Cirrhosis in the United States: A Population-based Study.美国肝硬化的流行病学:一项基于人群的研究。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep;49(8):690-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000208.
3
The history and future of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: food for thought.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的历史与未来:值得思考的问题
经颈静脉肝内门体分流术后的医院再入院:一项为期14年的单中心经验。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2019 Nov 28;8(2):98-103. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goz062. eCollection 2020 Apr.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Indwelling Pleural Catheters in Management of Hepatic Hydrothorax: A Systematic Review of Literature.留置胸膜导管治疗肝性胸水的疗效与安全性:文献系统评价
Cureus. 2018 Aug 6;10(8):e3110. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3110.
5
Hospital costs, length of stay and prevalence of hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.炎症性肠病患者的住院费用、住院时长及髋膝关节置换术患病率
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul 14;23(26):4752-4758. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i26.4752.
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2014 Sep;31(3):258-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1382794.
4
Acute pulmonary hypertension after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a potentially deadly but commonly forgotten complication.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术后急性肺动脉高压:一种潜在致命但常被遗忘的并发症。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2014 Jan-Feb;37(1):33-8; quiz 39-40. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000016.
5
The History and Evolution of Balloon-occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (BRTO): From the United States to Japan and Back.球囊闭塞逆行经静脉栓塞术(BRTO)的历史与演变:从美国到日本再回归
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2011 Sep;28(3):283-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1284454.
6
Cost-effective analysis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus surgical portacaval shunt for variceal bleeding in early cirrhosis.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术与外科门腔分流术治疗早期肝硬化静脉曲张出血的成本效益分析
Am Surg. 2011 Feb;77(2):169-73.
7
More patients, less payment: increasing hospital efficiency in the aftermath of health reform.更多患者,更少报酬:医改后提高医院效率。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jan;30(1):76-80. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1114.
8
Expected increase in prevalence of HCV-related cirrhosis and its complications in the United States: no effect of current antiviral treatment coverage?美国丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)相关肝硬化及其并发症患病率的预期增长:当前抗病毒治疗覆盖率无影响?
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2010 Nov;34(11):577-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gcb.2010.09.004. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
9
Patency and clinical outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents versus bare stents: a meta-analysis.聚四氟乙烯覆膜支架与裸支架经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的通畅率和临床结局:荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Nov;25(11):1718-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06400.x.
10
TIPS is a cost effective alternative to surgical shunt as a rescue therapy for prevention of recurrent bleeding from esophageal varices.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)作为一种抢救疗法,对于预防食管静脉曲张反复出血而言,是一种比外科分流术更具成本效益的替代方案。
J Hepatol. 2008 Mar;48(3):387-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.12.009. Epub 2008 Jan 3.