Gurgle Holly E, White Karen, McAdam-Marx Carrie
Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016 Jun 4;12:239-49. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S83088. eCollection 2016.
Controversy exists regarding the selection of second-line therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are unable to achieve glycemic control with metformin therapy alone. Newer pharmacologic treatments for T2DM include glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Both the classes of medication are efficacious, exhibit positive effects on weight, and are associated with minimal risk of hypoglycemia. The purpose of this review is to compare the clinical trial and real-world effectiveness data of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors related to A1c reduction, weight loss, cost-effectiveness, cardiovascular outcomes, and safety in patients with T2DM. This review summarizes comparative evidence for providers who are determining which of the two classes may be the most appropriate for a specific patient.
对于仅使用二甲双胍治疗无法实现血糖控制的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者,二线治疗方案的选择存在争议。T2DM的新型药物治疗包括胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂。这两类药物都有效,对体重有积极影响,且低血糖风险极小。本综述的目的是比较胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂在降低糖化血红蛋白(A1c)、减肥、成本效益、心血管结局以及T2DM患者安全性方面的临床试验和真实世界有效性数据。本综述总结了相关比较证据,以帮助医疗服务提供者确定这两类药物中哪一类可能最适合特定患者。