Diener Ina, Kargela Mark, Louw Adriaan
a Department of Physical Therapy , Stellenbosch University , Stellenbosch , South Africa.
b Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , Mayo Clinic , Phoenix , AZ , USA.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2016 Jul;32(5):356-67. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2016.1194648. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
The interview of a patient attending physical therapy is the cornerstone of the physical examination, diagnosis, plan of care, prognosis, and overall efficacy of the therapeutic experience. A thorough, skilled interview drives the objective tests and measures chosen, as well as provides context for the interpretation of those tests and measures, during the physical examination. Information from the interview powerfully influences the treatment modalities chosen by the physical therapist (PT) and thus also impacts the overall outcome and prognosis of the therapy sessions. Traditional physical therapy focuses heavily on biomedical information to educate people about their pain, and this predominant model focusing on anatomy, biomechanics, and pathoanatomy permeates the interview and physical examination. Although this model may have a significant effect on people with acute, sub-acute or postoperative pain, this type of examination may not only gather insufficient information regarding the pain experience and suffering, but negatively impact a patient's pain experience. In recent years, physical therapy treatment for pain has increasingly focused on pain science education, with increasing evidence of pain science education positively affecting pain, disability, pain catastrophization, movement limitations, and overall healthcare cost. In line with the ever-increasing focus of pain science in physical therapy, it is time for the examination, both subjective and objective, to embrace a biopsychosocial approach beyond the realm of only a biomedical approach. A patient interview is far more than "just" collecting information. It also is a critical component to establishing an alliance with a patient and a fundamental first step in therapeutic neuroscience education (TNE) for patients in pain. This article highlights the interview process focusing on a pain science perspective as it relates to screening patients, establishing psychosocial barriers to improvement, and pain mechanism assessment.
对接受物理治疗的患者进行访谈是体格检查、诊断、护理计划、预后评估以及整个治疗体验效果评估的基石。全面、专业的访谈不仅能决定体格检查中所选用的客观测试和测量方法,还能为这些测试和测量结果的解读提供背景信息。访谈所获取的信息会有力地影响物理治疗师(PT)所选择的治疗方式,进而影响治疗疗程的整体结果和预后。传统物理治疗严重依赖生物医学信息来帮助人们了解自身疼痛,这种以解剖学、生物力学和病理解剖学为主导的模式贯穿于访谈和体格检查过程。尽管这种模式可能对急性、亚急性或术后疼痛患者有显著效果,但这种检查方式可能不仅无法充分收集有关疼痛体验和痛苦的信息,还会对患者的疼痛体验产生负面影响。近年来,针对疼痛的物理治疗越来越注重疼痛科学教育,越来越多的证据表明疼痛科学教育对疼痛、残疾、疼痛灾难化、运动受限以及总体医疗成本有积极影响。随着物理治疗中对疼痛科学的关注度不断提高,主观和客观检查都应超越单纯的生物医学方法,采用生物心理社会方法的时候到了。患者访谈远不止是“仅仅”收集信息。它也是与患者建立联盟的关键组成部分,是为疼痛患者开展治疗性神经科学教育(TNE)的重要第一步。本文重点介绍了从疼痛科学角度出发的访谈过程,涉及筛选患者、确定改善的心理社会障碍以及疼痛机制评估等方面。