Madfis Eric
a University of Washington Tacoma.
J Psychol. 2017 Jan 2;151(1):21-35. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2016.1196161. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
This article discusses Joel Best's ( 1999 ) notion of random violence and applies his concepts of pointlessness, patternlessness, and deterioration to the reality about multiple-victim school shootings gleaned from empirical research about the phenomenon. Best describes how violence is rarely random, as scholarship reveals myriad observable patterns, lots of discernable motives and causes, and often far too much fear-mongering over how bad society is getting and how violent we are becoming. In contrast, it is vital that the media, scholars, and the public better understand crime patterns, criminal motivations, and the causes of fluctuating crime rates. As an effort toward such progress, this article reviews the academic literature on school rampage shootings and explores the extent to which these attacks are and are not random acts of violence.
本文讨论了乔尔·贝斯特(1999)关于随机暴力的概念,并将他的无意义、无模式和恶化的概念应用于从关于这一现象的实证研究中收集到的多受害者校园枪击案的现实情况。贝斯特描述了暴力很少是随机的,因为学术研究揭示了无数可观察到的模式、许多可辨别的动机和原因,而且往往存在太多关于社会变得多么糟糕以及我们变得多么暴力的恐慌言论。相比之下,媒体、学者和公众更好地理解犯罪模式、犯罪动机以及犯罪率波动的原因至关重要。作为朝着这一进展所做的努力,本文回顾了关于校园狂暴枪击案的学术文献,并探讨了这些袭击在何种程度上是或不是随机暴力行为。