Carter Stacy L, Noble Nicole, Lee Jaehoon, Li Xinyang, Crews Charles
Department of Special Education, College of Education, Texas Tech University, 79409-1071, Lubbock, TX, P.O. Box 41071, United States.
Department of Educational Psychology, Leadership, and Counseling, College of Education, Lubbock, TX, United States.
J Prev (2022). 2023 Apr;44(2):165-179. doi: 10.1007/s10935-022-00705-z. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
Colleges and universities are challenged with making their campuses safe from many threats of violence such as active shooters by using strategies that are effective and acceptable to their campus communities. Implementing strategies that are ineffective can waste resources and implementing strategies that are unacceptable may result in students, faculty, and staff that protest or leave the campus. The current study evaluated the acceptability of 11 different strategies to prevent active shooters on college/university campuses. Self-efficacy of the participants was measured to determine influences on acceptability ratings along with other demographic variables such as gender, race, and education levels. Results revealed differences in acceptability of active shooter prevention procedures and demographic variable influences. Implications for designing prevention measures on college and university campuses are discussed.
学院和大学面临着一项挑战,即要通过采用对校园社区有效且可接受的策略,来保障校园安全,使其免受诸如主动射击者等多种暴力威胁。实施无效的策略会浪费资源,而实施不可接受的策略可能导致学生、教师和工作人员抗议或离开校园。当前的研究评估了11种不同策略在预防学院/大学校园主动射击事件方面的可接受性。对参与者的自我效能感进行了测量,以确定其对可接受性评级的影响,同时还测量了其他人口统计学变量,如性别、种族和教育水平。结果揭示了主动射击预防程序的可接受性差异以及人口统计学变量的影响。文中讨论了对学院和大学校园预防措施设计的启示。